Abstract:The paper tries to situate Freud's theory historically by referring it to a paradigm of psychological theory that Marcel Gauchet describes as the "Golden Age" of psychophysics and reflex theory, and that he situates between 1870 and 1900. I will show that until 1900 Freud thinks, in fact, in categories that correspond to this type of thought. His texts On the Psychical Mechanism of Hysterical Phenomena (1893, with Josef Breuer) and A Project for a Scientific Psychology (1895) still follow the conception of a psychological subject on the basis of the stimulus and response model, which can be found in numerous contemporaneous authors. In this model, the psyche is just a place of transit open to the exterior, and its unity can only be a sum of elements of consciousness having a physiological substrate. Nevertheless, Freud's early texts--although appertaining to the reflex paradigm--already contain elements that serve to construct another basic model of the psychic apparatus, which is finally introduced by The Interpretation of Dreams. Those new elements are the separation between interior and exterior, the introduction of endogenous energy, which is linked to the importance of emotions instead of sensations, and the problem of the adaptation to outer reality that results from it. Nevertheless, once more Freud is not the only theorist in whose thought the new paradigm can be found; I again refer his new premises to other contemporary psychologists. The question that arises from Freud's passage from one paradigm to another is how he handles the continuity of his own thought. I describe the difficult compromise between contradictory concepts he finds in his Project for a Scientific Psychology; but certain concepts that derive from the reflex paradigm subsist even during the later development of psychoanalysis. This is especially the case for the concept of the unconscious itself: As I argue, this concept originates in the reflex paradigm, and, in contrast to contemporary psychology, Freud only maintains it longer than other authors do.

[Critique of the Freudian cultural concept]

Recapitulation, Heredity, and Freud's View of Human Nature

From Civilization of Pessimism to Culture of Compassion: Self Psychological Reflections on Freud’s Essay “Civilization and Its Discontents”

["... Otherwise we should get, not neurotics, but scoundrels". Karl Abraham's reception of Freud's theory of sexuality]

Sexual aberration or instinctual vicissitude? Revisiting freud's "the sexual aberrations"

[Freud's "Critical Introduction to Neuropathology" (1885-87): context and significance]

Reckoning with sexuality

Defensive anality and anal narcissism

The Historical Character of Human Nature in Freud's Theories

The Return of the Primal Father: A Comparative Freudian Reading of Two Novels

Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis as the basis of anthropology

[Controversy regarding Freud. On the postponement of the Freud exhibit in the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C]

[From dissociation to system: The concept of the unconscious as a descendant of the reflex paradigm in Freud]

Another Critique of Modernity:The Relation Between Individuality and Sociality in Durkheimian Sociology

Classical Readings in Culture and Civilization

“Ritual” in Recent Criticism: The Elusive Sense of Community

Erich Fromm: Ancestor of Social Psychoanalytic Practice

[Psychoanalysis and engagement: Otto Fenichel and the political Freudians]

Do We Need a Concept of Culture?

Sigmund Freud and his impact on our understanding of male sexual dysfunction

[Psychiatry and the assessment of human destructiveness: on the question of drawing the line between the "normal" concept of evil and psychiatric illnesses]