Consumption Aversion in Japanese Students: Factor Structure and Correlations with Well-being

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-023-00717-7
2023-04-02
Psychological Studies
Abstract:Contemporary Japanese youth are allegedly consumption aversive. We developed a measure of consumption aversion and examined its factor structure, validated in relation to social comparison and obedience. Additionally, its relationship to well-being was analyzed. Different theories make competing predictions; theories on materialism and thrift life predict a positive correlation between consumption aversion and well-being, while those on hedonic consumption and curiosity/interest predict a negative correlation. In Study 1, Japanese students ( N = 269) completed questionnaires on consumption aversion and well-being. In Study 2, participants ( N = 178) completed a modified consumption aversion scale to measure reduced interest in listed items instead of reduced spending, enabling differentiating reduced interest from spending to examine the curiosity/interest theory. The findings showed that (1) consumption aversion comprises two factors: youth and traditional matters—this could not be explained through the experiential versus material consumption distinction; (2) consumption aversion to youth matters was negatively related to social comparison for opinion—both youth and traditional aversions were positively related to obedient conformity; (3) Japanese students are consumption aversive on average; (4) consumption aversion in youth matters was related to lower, while in traditional matters was related to higher psychological well-being—the latter conflicts with the hedonic consumption hypothesis but is consistent with thrift life theory; (5) covariance with materialism did not explain the consumption aversion–well-being relation; and (6) relation between traditional matters and well-being differed across reduced interest and spending—that between youth matters and well-being was equivalent across reduced interest and spending. The results partially support the curiosity/behavior activation theory.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?