Abstract:Background context:Patients with spinal metastases always have a poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disease- and treatment-related adverse outcomes. The Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ) has been verified and validated in English for patients with spinal metastases but not in Chinese.Purpose:This paper aimed to complete the cross-cultural adaptation of the Chinese version of the SOSGOQ, to verify its reliability and validity, and to report on the HRQoL of Chinese patients with spinal metastases.Study design/setting:This is a single-center, prospective, observational cross-sectional study.Patient sample:Seventy-six patients were enrolled in this study.Outcome measures:The SOSGOQ is made up of five HRQoL domains (physical function, neurological function, pain, mental health, social function) and post-therapy questions. The EQ-5D 3L questionnaire covers five items in mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain discomfort, and anxiety-depression, each with three answer options. The SF-36 comprises 36 items divided into eight domains.Methods:A single-center, prospective, observational cross-sectional study involving patients with spinal metastases who underwent surgery was conducted. HRQoL was evaluated using the Chinese version of the SOSGOQ, the Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), and the EuroQol 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Demographic, tumor, symptom, and treatment data, as well as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) information, were collected. Internal consistency reliability, convergent validity, concurrent validity, and clinical validity were used to evaluate reliability. A Spearman's correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between variables.Results:This study enrolled 76 patients, with a mean age of 55.8 years. The kidney was the most common primary tumor site, and the thoracic spine was the most affected. The internal consistency of the overall SOSQOQ (0.907) was higher than the EQ-5D (0.819), and all items of the SOSQOQ had a high convergent validity (>0.40). The SOSGOQ was significantly correlated with the EQ-5D in respective domains (p < 0.001) and overall score (p < 0.001), whereas the SF-36 was related to the overall SOSGOQ score and most domains. Total SOSGOG was significantly sensitive to changes in ECOG (p = 0.017), prior surgery (p = 0.001), and tumor type (p = 0.026).Conclusions:The SOSGOQ is a reliable and effective tool for evaluating HRQoL in patients with spinal metastases, with high sensitivity and specificity. Surgical treatment can significantly improve patients' HRQoL.

Spiritual well-being correlates with quality of life of both cancer and non-cancer patients in palliative care - further validation of EORTC QLQ-SWB32 in Finnish

Associations between sex, age and spiritual well-being scores on the EORTC QLQ-SWB32 for patients receiving palliative care for cancer: A further analysis of data from an international validation study

Relationship between Spiritual Health and Quality of Life in Patients with Cancer

Spiritual Well-Being and Spiritual Distress in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: Utilizing the SWBQ as Component of Holistic Nursing Diagnosis

Translation, Cultural, and Clinical Validation of the Lithuanian Version of the Spiritual Needs Questionnaire among Hospitalized Cancer Patients

Finnish translation, validation, and reproducibility of BREAST-Q modules relevant to breast cancer treatment

Spiritual needs and their association with indicators of quality of life among non-terminally ill cancer patients: Cross-sectional survey

Spiritual Assessment within Clinical Interventions Focused on Quality of Life Assessment in Palliative Care: A Secondary Analysis of a Systematic Review

Development and Validation of a New Tool for the Assessment and Spiritual Care of Palliative Care Patients

Spiritual assessment in palliative care: multicentre study

Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Questionnaire on Well-Being: a validation study for a clinically informed measurement of subjective well-being

Interactions of Spiritual Well-Being, Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Treatment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study

Quality of life patient/cancer survivor version in Chinese cancer survivors: A validation study

Exploring the relationship between spiritual well-being and death anxiety in patients with gynecological cancer: a cross-section study

Dimensions of spiritual well-being in relation to physical and psychological symptoms: a cross-sectional study of advanced cancer patients admitted to a palliative care unit

Translation and pilot validation of Hindi, Marathi, and Bangla translation of quality of life EORTC module (QLQ-SH-22) for assessing sexual health-related quality of life

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire.

The Effects of Workplace Spirituality and Self-Efficacy on Quality of Life Among Cancer Survivors: Empirical Quantitative Research

Unlocking the Hidden Dimensions of Cancer Care: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Feasibility Study of ESAS-FS, Assessing Spiritual Pain and Financial Distress in a Spanish-speaking Population with Advanced Cancer

Longitudinal changes in spiritual well-being and associations with emotional distress, pain, and optimism–pessimism: a prospective observational study of terminal cancer patients admitted to a palliative care unit

The Role of Spiritual Well-Being in Spanish Cancer Patients: Exploring the Relationship Between Health, Religiosity and Spirituality, and the Underlying Psychosocial and Behavioral Pathways