Abstract:As a surgical method to treat children with sagittal craniosynostosis, calvarial vault reconstruction is subjected to some limitations. In traditional surgical method to treat children with sagittal craniosynostosis, surgical resection and fixation are performed all by the experience of surgical doctor, which is likely to cause individual differences, insecure fixation, configurational asymmetry, and waste of unnecessary fixtures materials. This study aims to provide surgical doctor with objective indicators via 3D simulation combined with biomechanical calculation, so as to improve the surgical efficiency. Methods: The aim of this study is to compare preoperative strategy integrating computer-assisted 3D simulation and biomechanical calculation and traditional strategy. A retrospective method was used to compare the effect and difference between these 2 strategies. The clinical data of 18 patients with sagittal synostosis were collected and compared. Among them, 10 patients were enrolled in Group A applied with traditional treatment method, while 8 were enrolled in Group B applied with preoperative strategy integrating computer-assisted 3D simulation and biomechanical calculation. The aim of this study is to evaluate two treatment methods by investigating indexes between two groups, such as length of operation, blood loss, operation cost, and postoperative complications. Through comparing the cranial index, head circumference, and cranial vault asymmetry index of two groups before and after treatment, the surgical effects of two groups can be evaluated. Moreover, biomechanical analyses for two groups were conducted. Results: Regarding group B, the length of operation was (217 +/- 29.3 min), blood loss was (70 +/- 11.7 ml), operation cost was (34,495 +/- 8662(sic)); while for group A, the length of operation was (276 23.5 min), blood loss was (90 +/- 15.5 ml), operation cost was (25,149 +/- 4133(sic)). No postoperative complication was observed for group B, while there was 1 case of central nervous system infection occurred in group A. The cranial indexes of both groups were significantly improved after treatment. The head circumferences of both groups were insignificantly changed after treatment. Through comparing the cranial vault asymmetry index of two groups before and after treatment, the cranial vaults of patients of group A were not so symmetrical as Group B after treatment. Conclusions: This research proposes the application of preoperative strategy integrating computer assisted 3D technique and biomechanical analysis, which allows surgical doctors to have a clear understanding on the surgical process before operation. In particular, this new treatment method for the first time adopts biomechanical calculation to determine the setting position and setting quantity of fixtures materials, so as to realize a firm and symmetrical effect, reduce waste of unnecessary fixtures materials, increase surgical efficiency, reduce length of operation, blood loss, and occurrence of postoperative complications Computer-assisted 3D technique with biomechanical analysis is a new advanced technique for the treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Spring-Assisted Surgery of Unilambdoid Craniosynostosis

Springs Produce Favorable Morphologic Outcomes Relative to H-Craniectomy According to a Two-Center Comparison of Matched Cases

Assessment of Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Multi-Center Time Series Study

Spring-assisted posterior vault expansion in children over 2 years of age with craniosynostosis

Correction of Craniosynostosis Using Modified Spring-Assisted Surgery.

Sagittal synostosis: does choice of intervention and its timing affect the long-term aesthetic and neurodevelopmental outcome? A single-institution study of 167 children

A coddling of the sagittal suture: inequality in spring-assisted expansion

Integrated Endoscopic Craniosynostosis Surgery and Cranial Orthosis Program

Intraoperative Ultrasound in Endoscopic Sagittal Suture Synostosis to Optimize Incision Planning and Avoid Misdiagnosis

Application of Computer Assisted Three-Dimensional Simulation Operation and Biomechanics Analysis in the Treatment of Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

Automated surgical planning in spring-assisted sagittal craniosynostosis correction using finite element analysis and machine learning

Understanding the influence of surgical parameters on craniofacial surgery outcomes: a computational study

Bilateral Fronto-Orbital Advancement Combined with Cranial Vault Release Using a Free-Floating Bone Flap Technique for Nonsyndromic Unilateral Coronal Synostosis.

Endoscopy-Assisted Craniosynostosis Surgery Versus Cranial Vault Remodeling for Non-Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Experience of a Single Center

Bilateral frontal-orbital reconstruction plus craniotomy for unilateral coronal synostosis

Endoscopic surgery for craniosynostosis: A systematic review and single-arm meta analysis

Objective Classification System for Sagittal Craniosynostosis Based on Suture Segmentation

Spring-assisted posterior vault expansion: a parametric study to improve the intracranial volume increase prediction

Craniofacial Collaboration UK: Developmental Outcomes in 5-Year-Old Children With Sagittal Synostosis

Early Bone and Suture Reformations in Different Cranial Regions After Cranial Vault Remodeling for Sagittal Craniosynostosis

Total Cranial Vault Remodelling Versus Minimally Invasive Suturectomy With Postoperative Helmet Therapy in Sagittal Craniosynostosis