What predicts instructional quality and commitments to teaching: self-efficacy, pedagogical knowledge or integration of the two?

Äli Leijen,Margus Pedaste,Aleksandar Baucal,Katrin Poom-Valickis,Liina Lepp
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1287313
IF: 3.8
2024-01-30
Frontiers in Psychology
Abstract:The aim of the paper is to identify different groups of in-service teachers based on their general pedagogical knowledge (GPK) and self-efficacy beliefs and to explore potential differences among these groups regarding their instructional quality and commitments to teaching. A sample of 161 in-service subject teachers (science, mathematics, or Estonian language) who taught in lower secondary schools in Estonia were included in the study. Data was collected with a GPK test and self-reported questionnaires on instructional quality and commitments to teaching in the context of an OECD Teacher Knowledge Survey. Based on the cluster analysis, three groups of in-service teachers were identified: "the over-confident" teachers with average self-efficacy and very low GPK, "the competent" teachers with high self-efficacy and GPK, and "the insecure" teachers with low self-efficacy and average GPK. These three types of teachers were different in terms of instructional quality and commitments to teaching. It seemed that teachers' self-efficacy beliefs are more important than GPK for instructional quality; however, GPK is more important for teachers' professional persistence illuminating their general sense of professional identity. Implications of these findings for teacher education and teacher retention will be discussed.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?