Long-term care insurance.

Sauder,Thomas Davidoff

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1984.11702949

2019-05-29

Hospital Practice

Abstract:This chapter summarizes the considerable variation in limitations to “activities of daily living” and associated expenditures on long-term care, with an emphasis on US data, then takes up the question of why the market for private insurance against this large risk is small. Donated care from family, otherwise illiquid home equity, and the shortened life and diminished demand for other consumption associated with receiving care may all undermine demand for long-term care insurance. Selection and moral hazard problems also affect the supply of public and private long-term care insurance. This chapter explores the market for insurance against expenditures on long-term care for limitations to “activities of daily living” (ADLs) such as bathing, dressing, and eating. An organizing theme is understanding why the market for private insurance is small, even though out-of-pocket expenditures are highly variable across individuals and may be very large. Section 1 describes how ADL limitations vary with age, and how the type of care used and expenditures on care vary with family structure and the extent of limitation, with an emphasis on US data. Section 2 briefly characterizes existing public and private long-term care insurance schemes. Public systems pay a larger share of long-term care costs than private insurance throughout the developed world. Because public schemes are commonly progressive both in funding and in coverage, relatively wealthy households in some countries are exposed to potentially very large losses. Section 3 considers reasons why demand for insuring against long-term ∗I thank Saku Aura, Jeff Brown, Amy Finkelstein, Robin McKnight, Barbara Spencer, Ralph Winter, and two referees for guidance. This theme is shared with other summaries of the literature, e.g. Brown and Finkelstein (2009).

Medicine,Economics