Results of clinical effectiveness of conventional versus Mirasol‐treated Apheresis Platelets in Patients with Hypoproliferative Thrombocytopenia (MiPLATE) trial

Scott A. Koepsell,Moritz Stolla,Rebecca L. Sedjo,Jeffrey Carson,Michael Knudson,Richard Cook,Ross Fasano,Samantha G. Ngamsuntikul,Claudia Cohn,Jed Gorlin,Meghan Delaney,Sherrill Slichter,Paul Ness,Jeffrey McCullough
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.17720
2024-02-07
Transfusion
Abstract:Background The Mirasol® Pathogen Reduction Technology System was developed to reduce transfusion‐transmitted diseases in platelet (PLT) products. Study Design and Methods MiPLATE trial was a prospective, multicenter, controlled, randomized, non‐inferiority (NI) study of the clinical effectiveness of conventional versus Mirasol‐treated Apheresis PLTs in participants with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. The novel primary endpoint was days of ≥Grade 2 bleeding with an NI margin of 1.6. Results After 330 participants were randomized, a planned interim analysis of 297 participants (145 MIRASOL, 152 CONTROL) receiving ≥1 study transfusion found a 2.79‐relative rate (RR) in the MIRASOL compared to the CONTROL in number of days with ≥Grade 2 bleeding (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67–4.67). The proportion of subjects with ≥Grade 2 bleeding was 40.0% (n = 58) in MIRASOL and 30.3% (n = 46) in CONTROL (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.97–1.81, p = .08). Corrected count increments were lower (p
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?