Risk and protective factors for offending

David P Farrington, Rolf Loeber, Maria M Ttofi

2012-03-12

Abstract:During the 1990s, there was a revolution in criminology, as the risk-factor prevention paradigm became influential (Farrington 2000). The basic idea of this paradigm is very simple: identify the key risk factors for offending and implement prevention methods designed to counteract them. This paradigm was imported into criminology from public health, where it had been used successfully for many years to tackle illnesses such as cancer and heart disease, by pioneers such as Hawkins and Catalano (1992). The risk-factor prevention paradigm links explanation and prevention; fundamental and applied research; and scholars, policymakers, and practitioners. Loeber and Farrington (1998) presented a detailed exposition of this paradigm as applied to serious and violent juvenile offenders. A risk factor for offending is defined as a variable that predicts a high probability of later offending. Typically, risk factors are dichotomized, so that they are either present or absent. Because of the emphasis of this Handbook, this essay focuses on risk factors that could possibly be changed in intervention studies. Therefore, gender, race/ethnicity, criminal parents, and large family size are not reviewed here, although their links with offending may be explained by changeable factors. For example, Fagan et al.(2007) concluded that boys committed more crimes than girls because boys had higher risk factor scores and lower protective factor scores. In order to determine whether a risk factor is a predictor or possible cause of offending, the risk factor needs to be measured before the offending. Therefore, prospective longitudinal surveys are needed to investigate risk factors.