P064 Prevention is better than cure: acitretin and chemoprevention

Fazleenah Ajmul Hussain,Paul Devakar Yesudian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.091
IF: 11.113
2024-06-28
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have an increased incidence of cutaneous malignancy, especially nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC), where the risk is estimated to be up to 65 times higher than that of the general population. A 10-fold increase in mortality has been reported for NMSC in SOTRs. There are currently no guidelines on chemoprevention of recurrent keratinocyte tumours (KTs) in patients with or without transplants, leading to variation in clinical practice. We undertook an online survey analysing acitretin use for NMSC chemoprevention among British dermatologists. The questionnaire was distributed through email to dermatologists in the UK. We received 52 responses, of which 37 (71%) were from consultants. Most responses came from dermatologists practising in Scotland (34, 65%). The cohort was highly experienced, with 20 (38%) having > 20 years’ dermatology experience and 13 (25%) responders having 11–20 years’ experience. Overall, 24 (46%) saw fewer than five SOTRs in their clinic in a month and 20 (38%) saw hardly any. In nontransplant patients, 26 (50%) dermatologists prescribed acitretin for recurrent KTs, whereas 13 (25%) did not. The preferred dosing was 10 mg for the majority (29, 60% of those with data). Prescribers (n = 25, 53%) commenced patients on acitretin after they developed at least two to five KTs; one prescriber started acitretin after development of at least one KT. In the SOTR group, acitretin was prescribed after development of recurrent KT and not pre-emptively; 10 mg was the preferred dose for majority (22, 47%). For both SOTRs and nontransplant patients, acitretin was prescribed indefinitely by 31 (63%) responders. Interestingly, 17 (35%) dermatologists did not prescribe acitretin in SOTRs and 10 (20%) did not prescribe acitretin in either SOTRs or nontransplant patients. Thirteen (25%) did not prescribe acitretin in nontransplant patients with recurrent KT. Side-effects of acitretin were not severe enough to lead to discontinuation according to 16 (35%) responders. Some commented that adverse events were patient and dose dependent, and by minimizing the dose of acitretin, they reduced side-effects. In total, 47 (92%) provided regular photoprotective advise to patients with recurrent KTs. Overall, 49 (94%) did not encounter patients with skin of colour with recurrent KTs in their practice. To our knowledge, this is the first survey assessing the practice of acitretin use in chemoprevention in both transplant and nontransplant patients. Our survey suggests discrepancies in practice among dermatologists prescribing acitretin in SOTRs and nontransplant patients. More than one-third did not prescribe acitretin in SOTRs with recurrent KTs. There is good evidence that acitretin reduces the incidence of KT in SOTRs, and hence its use should be encouraged in this cohort.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?