Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring provides no benefit over structured self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes not on prandial insulin, in the context of diabetes self-management education: GLucose monitoring programme SingaporE (GLiMPSE)

Suresh Rama Chandran,Nabilah Rahman,Mihir Gandhi,Ngiap Chuan Tan,Ian K.Y. Phoon,Darren E.J. Seah,Ming Hann Cheah,Kathleen Sek,Daphne Su-Lyn Gardner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111678
IF: 8.18
2024-04-20
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Abstract:Objective We evaluated the impact of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring(is-CGM) over self-monitoring of blood glucose(SMBG) in the context of diabetes self-management education (DSME) in sub-optimally controlled type 2 diabetes(T2D) in a multi-ethnic setting. Research Design and Method Randomized-controlled, open-label trial (NCT04564911), of T2D with HbA1c ≥ 7.5-≤10 %, on oral agents with/without basal insulin was carried out. Intervention arm received 6 weeks(w) continuous is-CGM, followed by one is-CGM/month till 24w. Control arm was advised to perform 4 SMBG/day. Education was delivered at weeks 0, 2, 8, 16. Primary outcome: Change in HbA1c from baseline at 24w. Modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis with linear mixed-effect model for repeated measurements was performed. Results 176 subjects, age 55 ± 10.7 years(y), DM duration 11 ± 7.3y, BMI 27.8 ± 5.9 kg/m 2 , 58 % Male, 29.5 % basal insulin users were analysed. Within each arm, from baseline to 24w, mean HbA1c decreased by −0.6 % (−6.6.mmol/mol, p-value < 0.01) and weight decreased (isCGM: −1.44 kg; SMBG: −1.25 kg, both p 0.05). Conclusion In the context of DSME, use of either SMBG or is-CGM led to improved glycaemia and reduced weight over a period of 24 weeks, sustained to one year.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?