Abstract:Ecosystems provide essential services that form the basis of human well-being. Climate change-induced losses and damages to ecosystem services (l&d-ES) thus have significant impacts on societies. Yet, little of the work on losses and damages (l&d) has focused on ecosystem services. Also in international climate negotiations, where the debate emerged with the establishment of the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM), there remains space for better understanding and addressing l&d-ES. Part of the explanation of this lies in the challenge of assessing such l&d. To address this gap, this paper reviews scientific literature and data obtained from Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNAs) to explore ways forward for more in depth assessments. The review confirms that little attention has been given to the topic, identifying 27 relevant scientific papers with only 6 providing a disaggregated monetary value for l&d-ES. Also amongst the 64 analyised PDNAs, only 12 report such disaggregated value; valuing just one ecosystem service per impacted ecosystem. The review finds that the majority of both the scientific literature and the PDNAs relies on extrapolating values from the literature. To enhance l&d-ES assessment and, with that, the opportunity for better understanding, recognition and uptake by e.g. the WIM, this paper makes three recommendations: 1. establishing a baseline of ecosystems recognized for their services of disaster risk reduction and/or climate change adaptation, while highlighting the need for an accessible and representative benefit transfer database; 2. enhancing collaboration between scientists and practitioners; and 3. quantitatively increasing data on l&d-ES.There remains space for better understanding and addressing l&d-ES.To facilitate assessing l&d-ES, the establishment of ecological baselines should be encouraged for ecosystem services that can be reported on in other circumstances.Additionally, a benefit transfer database is needed that is that is geographically and ecologically representative, explicitly oriented towards l&d-ES, and easily accessible to both researchers and decision-makers.Considering the divergence of ecosystems addressed by different stakeholders, it may be advisable to encourage the collaboration of a wide stakeholder range, including scientists, to collect data that advance the understanding of l&d-ES.Disaggregated assessment of l&d-ES should be quantitatively increased and the WIM could encourage the reporting of l&d-ES, in order to expand the database and understanding of l&d-ES.

Research agenda for the loss and damage fund

Research needs for loss and damage

Loss and damage: a critical discourse analysis of Parties’ positions in climate change negotiations

Non-economic losses from climate change: opportunities for policy-oriented research

How can event attribution science underpin financial decisions on Loss and Damage?

The Risk and Policy Space for Loss and Damage: Integrating Notions of Distributive and Compensatory Justice with Comprehensive Climate Risk Management

Assessing losses and damages to ecosystem services: current state and opportunities for the Warsaw International Mechanism under the UNFCCC

Stakeholder perceptions of event attribution in the loss and damage debate

Event attribution is not ready for a major role in loss and damage

Putting the constructive ambiguity of climate change loss and damage into practice: The early work of the UNFCCC WIM ExCom

Perspectives on the Green Climate Fund: possible compromises on capitalization and balanced allocation

Policies for climate finance: Status and research needs

A giant fund for climate disasters will soon open. Who should be paid first?

Negotiating the future of the Adaptation Fund: on the politics of defining and defending justice in the post-Paris Agreement period

A research and development investment strategy to achieve the Paris climate agreement

Loss and Damage in the mountain cryosphere

Parametric loss and damage insurance schemes as a means to enhance climate change resilience in developing countries

Uncompensated claims to fair emission space risk putting Paris Agreement goals out of reach

Adaptation: is securing funding really the top priority for COP negotiations?

Climate Change Implications for the Public Finances and Fiscal Policy: An Agenda for Future Research and Filling the Gaps in Scholarly Work

Analysis of External Climate Finance Access and Implementation: CIF, FCPF, GCF and GEF Projects and Programs by the Inter-American Development Bank