Abstract:The mathematics problem solving approaches of a group of elementary and secondary ESL students were investigated through a performance assessment accompanied by think-aloud procedures. Students were enrolled in ESL mathematics classes in a Title VII project implementing the Cognitive Academic Learning Approach (CALLA). In this approach, curriculum content is used to develop academic language and learning strategies are taught explicitly to increase students' metacognitive awareness and to facilitate their learning of both content and language. Participating teachers were identified either as high implementation teachers (extensive involvement in staff development and other project activities) or low implementation teachers (limited involvement in project activities). The study was designed to identify learning and problem solving strategies of students at high, average and low mathematics achievement levels, and to compare strategic approaches of students in high implementation and low implementation classrooms. The results indicated that significantly more students in high implementation classrooms were able to solve the problem correctly than were students in low implementation classrooms. As expected, students rated high in math performance also performed significantly better on finding the correct problem solution. Of greater interest was the finding that there were no differences in the actual number of problem solving steps used by students in the two implementation levels, but that significant differences for high implementation classrooms were found for correct sequence of problem solving steps, which has been featured in instruction in the high implementation classrooms. This seemed to indicate that explicit instruction in a problem solving sequential procedure is helpful for ESL students. In addition, students in high implementation classrooms used significandy more metacognitive strategies than students in low implementation classrooms. High math ability students used the most metacognitive strategies in all types of classrooms. with average math ability students using fewer metacognitive strategies and low math ability students using the fewest metacognitive strategies. This finding seemed to indicate that students who were the highest achievers in mathematics and who received information about and practice in metacognitive strategies (such as planning, monitoring, and evaluating one's own learning) were better able to regulate their learning than less able math students or students in low implementation classrooms. Problems identified in the study were that even in high implementation classrooms, lower achieving students did not use the correct sequence of problem solving steps. Reasons could be attributed to differences in mathematics ability, differences in linguistic competence (since the task involved reading and understand a word problem), and/or amount of prior knowledge about learning and problem solving strategies. More research is needed to clarify these and other problems related to mathematics achievement of ESL students.

Math Is Not a Universal Language: Supporting Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities Using Explicit Vocabulary Instruction in Mathematics Classrooms

An intervention to support mathematics self-efficacy in middle school

Attending to Precision: Vocabulary Support in Middle School Mathematics Classrooms

“Math, I Don’t Get It”: An Exploratory Study on Verbalizing Mathematical Content by Students with Speech and Language Impairment, Students with Learning Disability, and Students Without Special Educational Needs

Mathematics instruction for elementary students with learning disabilities

Middle School Mathematics Instruction in Instructionally Focused Urban Districts

Examining the Alignment of Mathematics Instructional Practices and Mathematics Vocabulary between Core and Intervention Materials

More than words: a literature review of language of mathematics research

Promoting teacher self-efficacy for supporting English learners in mathematics: effects of the Visual Access to Mathematics professional development

Academic Vocabulary: Explicit and Incidental Instruction for Students of Diverse Language Backgrounds

Who benefits most from language-responsive learning materials in mathematics? Investigating differential effects in heterogeneous classrooms

Students with mild intellectual disability engaging in proportions word problems

Teaching argument writing in math class: challenges and solutions to improve the performance of 4th and 5th graders with disabilities

Teaching Fifth-Grade Students With Specific Learning Disabilities to Explain Their Mathematical Reasoning Through Written Expression

Understanding the Role of Academic Vocabulary in Content Acquisition for Middle School Students With and Without Disabilities

Strengthening vocabulary for literacy: an analysis of the use of explicit instruction techniques to improve word learning from story book read-alouds

Learning and Problem Solving Strategies of ESL Students

Hearing Math: Algebra Supported eText for Students With Visual Impairments

Research on Mathematical Dyslexia of Middle School Students in China

Addressing the Mathematics Gap for Students with ASD: an Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Video-Based Mathematics Interventions

Improving the Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills of Students with Learning Disabilities