Laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis and subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation

Xiu-Mei Deng,Tian-Yu Zhu,Guo-Jun Wang,Bu-Lang Gao,Rui-Xin Li,Jing-Tao Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01458-y
2023-03-15
Updates in Surgery
Abstract:To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA) and laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis (SC-ACRA) on adults with slow transit constipation (STC). One hundred and three patients with STC were assigned to the TC-IRA group ( n = 53) and the SC-ACRA group ( n = 50). The clinical data were analyzed. The surgery was successful in all patients (100%). Significantly ( P = 0.03) more patients took anti-laxatives during hospitalization in the TC-IRA than the SC-ACRA group (39.62% vs. 20.00%). Abdominal pain and distension was present in 33.96% and 32.00% patients in the TC-IRA and SC-ACRA group, respectively, which decreased insignificantly ( P > 0.05) to 18.87% and 18.00% 24 months after surgery, respectively. The postoperative Wexner and gastrointestinal quality of life (GIQLI) scores were not significantly different ( P > 0.05) at all times after surgery in both groups. The defecation frequency decreased in both groups, and the average defecation frequency was significantly ( P 0.05) different between the two groups. The WIS score of patients was significantly ( P = 0.035) higher in the TC-IRA than the SC-ACRA group (6 vs. 5) 3 months later. TC-IRA and SC-ACRA are both safe and effective for adult slow transit constipation, and can significantly improve the quality of life of patients. Even though SC-ACRA has better early defecation frequency, postoperative antidiarrheal application and satisfaction, the long-term follow-up effects are similar.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?