Spotlight on Digital Eye Strain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S389114
2023-02-28
Clinical Optometry
Abstract:Ioanna Mylona, 1 Mikes N Glynatsis, 2 Georgios D Floros, 3 Stylianos Kandarakis 4 1 Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Katerini, Katerini, Greece; 2 Department of Ophthalmology, 'Hippokration', General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; 3 2nd Department of Psychiatry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; 4 1st Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital "G. Gennimatas", National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece Correspondence: Ioanna Mylona, Ophthalmology Department, General Hospital of Serres, Serres, 62210, Greece, Tel +306941406978, Email Digital Eye Strain (DES) is a clinical syndrome manifested with visual disturbances and/or ophthalmic dysfunction related to the usage of screen-enabled digital equipment. This term is gradually replacing the older term computer vision syndrome (CVS) that focused on the same symptoms found on personal computer users. DES is encountered more frequently during the past years due to the explosive increase in the usage of digital devices and subsequent increase in time in front of any screens. It presents with a series of atypical symptoms and signs stemming from asthenopia, dry eye syndrome, preexisting untreated vision issues and poor screen ergonomics. This review summarizes research data to date to determine whether the concept of DES has been conclusively defined and demarcated as a separate entity and if sufficient guidance is offered on professionals and the lay public. The maturity of the field, grouping of symptoms, examination techniques, treatment and prevention modalities are summarily presented. Keywords: digital eye strain, computer vision syndrome, classification, management Vision problems attributable to prolonged viewing of screen-enabled digital devices have been reported since 1987 1 with an article detailing both ocular and orthopedic issues that were related to spending long hours in front of a computer terminal. Initially, the focus of research was the workplace, since screen-enabled devices were predominantly used for professional purposes due to their cost and size. However, the focus was expanded outside the workplace with the advent of home computing and the gradual reduction in size of screens with the shift from cathodic ray tubes to liquid crystal displays (LCDs) and light emitting displays (LEDs). 2 "Terminology has changed as well, with the initial terms, which were limited to computer use" (computer vision syndrome – CVS) gradually expanding to "Digital eye strain – DES", 3 a term coined to include any type of digital screen. In either case, both terms, CVS and DES, have come to signify a clinical syndrome, which includes numerous eyesight symptoms related to lengthy engagement in front of a screen-enabled digital device. DES symptoms are perceived as various degrees of irritation, which interferes with further screen viewing. Symptoms generally recede after some time away from the screen and receiving symptomatic treatment, while they may be prevented by correcting pre-existing errors in refraction or viewing habits. Although this syndrome has been widely reported and its existence even acknowledged by a number of professional bodies, 4–7 its transient nature and wide variance of symptoms leads to challenges with classification of cases, assessing its prevalence and stipulating recommendations for both the professional and the lay public. Estimates of prevalence range from 33% of the general public, up to 50% for groups that are using digital screens for an extended period of time, as for example were children and college students following classes online due to restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. 8,9 These studies also demonstrate a clear increase of symptoms, which was proportional to the increase on time spent online. Symptoms overlap with, or are dependent on the existence of other nosological entities, such as dry eye disease or various causes of uncorrected refraction. The syndrome also includes symptoms of extraocular origin that are attributed to poor ergonomics of the environment where screen viewing takes place and are thus outside the immediate attention of the optometrist or ophthalmologist who would evaluate the patient. Despite these objective hurdles in assessment, a recent anonymous survey of 406 optometrists in the UK and Ireland 10 found that the vast majority of respondents were in agreement that DES is an important concern for the profession (88.9%) with 91.4% responding that they felt confident in discussing symptoms and management options. It thus appears that adoption of DES is driven by necessity, despite those difficulties in its exact definition and classification. The purpose of -Abstract Truncated-
What problem does this paper attempt to address?