Abstract:Introduction Heart failure (HF) is not a diagnosis but rather a syndrome with a variety of potential causes and once a patient has been diagnosed as having HF, the underlying etiology should be sought and treated. Thus, patients with HF should be engaged in a disease management program that includes a dedicated wider healthcare team which is critical for delivering the best care for patients. A dedicated HF clinic is one of the cornerstones of this ultimate management program. This clinic is specifically made to make sure of the proper management and follow-up of those patients. There is a scarce evidence of weather a dedicated HF clinic can alter the long-term outcomes of HF patients or not. Thus, the aim of this study is to search for the impact of a dedicated HF clinic on patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) regarding the symptoms, management received according to latest guidelines, the patients' quality of life and impact on health care resources. Patients and Methods This is a single center retrospective study that included patients presented to a dedicated heart failure clinic at a secondary care hospital through a one-year period. The study group included patients with diagnosis of HFrEF only who had one or more visit to the HF clinic. These patients served as their own control. Hospital admissions and emergency room visits in the 12-month period preceding enrollment was compared to the number in the following year after enrollment. Patients with incomplete data and those with ejection fraction >40% were excluded. Results The study included 48 patients with a mean age of 65 years, 70.8% of them were males. Most of the patients were hypertensive (77.1%), diabetic (75%) and with history of coronary artery disease (60.4%). Symptoms improved significantly in all patients, left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction improved (31±8.1% vs 40.7±10.5%) (P<0.0001). NT-ProBNP level improved significantly (5927 ng/L vs 3135 ng/L) (P = 0.03). The guideline directed medical therapy was used properly before and after the clinic. There was a significant improvement in the quality of life where the KCCQ-12 score improved from 71.25±13.2 to 83.3±13.3 (P<0.0001), six-minute walk test also improved significantly from 362±184 meters to 479±211 meters (P = 0.005). Regarding the economic impact, there was no significant difference in the number of unplanned visits (20.8% vs 10.4%) (P = 0.16) but there was a significant reduction in the number of HF hospitalizations within one year (20.8% vs 6.25%) (P = 0.038) Conclusion Dedicated HF clinics are very important now for the proper management of HF patients where it is proved that it can improve HF symptoms, improve the quality of life measurements, maintain the proper guideline directed therapy and reduce the economic burden of HF through reducing the number of HF hospitalizations.Clinical dataOutcomes

Heartbeat: heart valve clinics improve outcomes in patients with aortic valve stenosis

Outcomes in patients with moderate and asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis followed up in heart valve clinics

Added value of heart valve clinics in the management of asymptomatic aortic stenosis

Severe aortic stenosis management in heart valve centres compared with primary/secondary care centres

Performance of the heart team approach in daily clinical practice in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis

The Impact of a Heart Failure Clinic on Clinical Outcomes: Our Experience

Clinical journey for patients with aortic regurgitation: A retrospective observational study from a multicenter database

Examining lack of referrals to heart valve specialists as mechanisms of potential underutilization of aortic valve replacement

The impact of a dedicated heart failure clinic on patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Aortic valve replacement versus conservative treatment in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: long-term follow-up of the AVATAR trial

Diagnosis and management of aortic valve stenosis in patients with heart failure

Prevalence, Characteristics and Prognostic Impact of Aortic Valve Disease in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced, Mildly Reduced, and Preserved Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of the ESC Heart Failure Long‐Term Registry

Early Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Conservative Management in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis

Impact of Moderate Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Outcome of Flow-Gradient Patterns of Aortic Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement: An Analysis of the PARTNER 2 Trial and Registry

P195 CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC STENOSIS AND HYPERTENSION UNDERGOING AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

Prevalence and prognosis of aortic valve diseases in patients hospitalized with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

Added value of a physician-and-nurse-directed heart failure clinic: results from the Deventer-Alkmaar heart failure study

Abstract P306: Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Survival After Mitral or Aortic Valve Surgery

Contemporary outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in patients referred for a transcatheter approach

Outcomes of patients with calcific aortic valve disease according to the extent of cardiac damage