Abstract:Abstract Ethically , behavior analysts are required to use the least aversive and restrictive procedures capable of managing behaviors of concern. This article introduces and discusses a multi-element paradigm for devising support plans that include ecological, positive programming, and focused-support proactive strategies for reducing the frequency of problem behavior occurrence. It also includes reactive strategies, i.e., separate independent variables. In this paradigm, reactive strategies are aimed solely at getting rapid, safe control over the incident, thereby reducing measured and quantified episodic severity. Behavior analysts who publish in mainstream behavioral journals do not always make it explicit how they, in fact, successfully employed non-aversive reactive procedures to achieve rapid/safe control over the severity of a behavioral incident. Three examples of published studies in the behavioral literature which successfully, though only implicitly, used non-aversive reactive strategies (NARS) to reduce the severity of the behaviors of concern are described. The multi-element paradigm discussed in the present article is illustrated by the support plans that address the challenging behavior of three children in a pre-school setting, using both proactive and reactive strategies. Reactive strategies were used for the purpose of reducing episodic severity (ES) and proactive strategies were aimed at reducing the frequency of occurrence. Following a comprehensive functional analysis and assessment (CFA) and the implementation of a multi-element behavior support (MEBS) plan, results show successful outcomes without the need for any aversive or restrictive procedures. When addressing severe behaviors of concern, in addition to reducing behavioral occurrence, safety should also be improved by reducing ES as a measured outcome and as a function of the reactive strategies employed, including in many cases, the use of strategic capitulation, i.e., providing the identified reinforcer for the target behavior.

Predicting and Managing Risk during Functional Analysis of Problem Behavior

On the Occurrence of Dangerous Problem Behavior during Functional Analysis: An Evaluation of 30 Applications

A Two Step Validation of the Performance-Based IISCA: A Trauma-Informed Functional Analysis Model

Distance-Based Collaborations for Assessing and Treating Challenging Behavior

A qualitative analysis of expert interviews on safety and risk

Functional analysis of problem behavior: A systematic approach for identifying idiosyncratic variables

Examining patterns suggestive of acquisition during functional analyses: A consecutive controlled series of 116 cases

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR: A REVIEW

Continuum of Care Screener: A Risk Mitigation Tool to Guide Decision Making When Environmental Factors Affect Service Delivery

Functional analysis screening for inappropriate mealtime behavior

EMERGING THEMES IN THE FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR

Clinical Safety and Treatment of Severe Aggression: Behavioral-Pharmacological Intervention Evaluation in a Young Adult With Autism Spectrum Disorder

The Effects of Conducting a Functional Analysis on Problem Behavior in Other Settings: A Descriptive Study on Potential Interaction Effects

In vivo functional assessment and multi-element interventions for problem behaviors of students with disabilities in classroom settings

Functional Analysis of Contextually Inappropriate Social Behavior in Children With Down Syndrome

Needed independent and dependent variables in multi-element behavior support plans addressing severe behavior problems

Towards Developing a Classroom-Based Functional Analysis Condition to Assess Escape-to-Attention as a Variable Maintaining Problem Behavior

FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT, CURRICULAR REVISION, AND SEVERE BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS

Using Additional Analyses to Clarify the Functions of Problem Behavior: An Analysis of Two Cases

Producing meaningful improvements in problem behavior of children with autism via synthesized analyses and treatments