Analysis of Fracture Network Formation Mechanisms and Main Controlling Factors of Methane Explosion Fracturing in Deep Shale Reservoir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-024-03908-4
IF: 6.518
2024-04-30
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Abstract:Methane in situ explosion fracturing can induce intricate fracture networks by detonating methane desorbed from deep shale reservoirs. Elucidating the fracture propagation mechanisms under high-pressure gas explosive loading, along with the predominant controlling factors and interactions between different factors, remains imperative for optimizing fracturing efficacy. This study first established a method for calculating the explosion characteristic parameters in the in situ reservoir environment and determined the dynamic constitutive model parameters for Wufeng–Longmaxi shale. Then numerical simulation model of methane explosion fracturing in the in situ shale reservoir was established. Then response surface methodology was used to design numerical experiments and analyze the effects of explosive loading, in situ stress, and stress difference on the fracturing efficiency. A dimensionless factor F mef was proposed for the comprehensive evaluation of the fracturing efficiency to elucidate the control mechanisms of the three factors. Lastly, the influence mechanisms of various factors on fracture growth are discussed from the perspective of coupled interactions between methane explosion loads and in situ stresses. The results demonstrate that the fracturing network can be delineated into smash district, damage zone, fracture zone, and vibration zone under gas explosive loading. With peak explosive pressure lower than the shale dynamic compressive strength, no smash district or damage zones appear, and increasing explosive loading markedly enlarges the extent of smash, damage, and fracture zones. The explosive loading predominantly affects the smash district and damage zone, whereas the stress state primarily influences the fracture zone. The response surface analysis with F mef reveals convex surfaces for both the in situ stress-explosive loading interaction and the stress differential–explosive loading interaction, due to the quadratic effect of the explosive loading. Increasing explosive loading initially positively influences fracturing efficiency, transitioning to a negative impact, while in situ stress and stress differential show a monotonically decreasing trend. Stress analysis showed that the in situ stress significantly suppresses fracture propagation induced by the explosion. Differential stress induces concentration in both vertical and horizontal directions around the wellbore, resulting in longer fracture length and stable propagation time along the maximum principal stress direction. The difference between the primary controls for compressive–shear failure in smash district and tensile failure in fracture zone is explained by the coupled interactions of dynamic loads and in situ stresses. By correlating reservoir pressure and stress state with stimulation success, the constructed response surface model offers a theoretically sound basis for identifying optimal formations for methane explosion fracturing.
engineering, geological,geosciences, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?