Abstract:Objective: To examine the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive coronary surgery-coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-CABG). Methods: From the first case in November 2015 to November 2019, a total of 244 cases of MICS-CABG were performed in Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital. There were 197 males and 47 females, aging (62.3±8.7)years (range: 36 to 88 years). The operations were performed via the 5(th) intercostal space of left thoracic lateral incision (length: 4 to 5 cm extended for 8 to 10 cm), and were performed under off-pump, with the help of the chest wall suspension device and cardiac fixator. The proximal anastomosis on ascending aorta and the distal anastomosis of left anterior descending branch, circumflex branch and right coronary system were completed according to procedure. In all 244 cases, the proportion of 2 grafts was 53.7% (131 cases), 3 grafts was 36.1% (88 cases), 4 grafts was 9.8% (24 cases) and 5 grafts was 0.4% (1 case). The average of grafts was 2.6±0.7 (range: 2 to 5). The proportion of hybrid was 14.3% (35 cases), sequential bypass procedure was 43.0% (105 cases) and multiple artery grafts was 25.4% (62 cases). The perioperative complications of the patients were collected, the patency rate of the grafts was evaluated by coronary angiography or CT within 7 days after the operation, and main adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were followed up. The survival curve was drawn by Kaplan-Meier method, and the 1-year MACCE rate was calculated by survival analysis. Results: All cases had no transition to thoracotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass procedure, and no cases needed intra aortic balloon pumping and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the operation.There were 2 cases of poor incision healing, and reoperation was performed in 10 cases (6 cases of postoperative bleeding, 2 cases of incision debridement, and 2 cases of grafts problems). The rate of MACCE in 30 days was 2.6% (10 cases), which contained 3 cases of death (2 cases of grafts occlusion, 1 case of serious hemorrhage after thoracic puncture drainage), 3 cases of stroke and 5 cases of non-fatal myocardial infarction. By the re-examination of angiography in 7 days after operation, the overall patency of the grafts was 96.1%, and the patency of the left anterior descending was 98.6%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted for 235 patients (96.3%) with 1 to 36 months follow-up results, and the 1-year MACCE rate was 5.6% (95%CI: 4.2% to 7.0%) . There was no significant difference among the incidences of MACCE at each stage of learning curve. Surgeon could reduce the operation time and complete more anastomosis with the accumulation of experience after the early 30 cases. Conclusions: MICS-CABG can safely achieve completed revascularization, which has good operative effects in short and medium-long term. There is no significant risk in the early cases of learning curve.

Multi-vessel coronary artery grafting: analyzing the minimally invasive approach and its safety

Short-term and Long-term Postoperative Safety of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials.

Comparing Perioperative Outcomes Following Off-Pump Multi-Vessel Minimally Invasive Via a Single Left Intercostal Space Incision with Median Sternotomy Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

[Feasibility and Safety of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery for Patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Early Outcome and Short-Mid-term Follow Up Results].

Is minimally invasive multi-vessel off-pump coronary surgery as safe and effective as MIDCAB?

Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Coronary Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

Comparison of Clinical Effects Between Left Chest Small Incision and Median Incision Multi-arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

[Clinical experience of minimal invasive coronary surgery-coronary artery bypass grafting: a series of 244 cases]

Clinical outcome and graft patency of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting for treatment of multi-vessel disease

Short- and Long-Term Results for Single and Multi-Vessel Disease

Comparison of Two Surgical Approaches for Coronary Artery Bypass of Left Anterior Descending Artery

[Early Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Coronary Surgery-Total Arterial Coronary Revascularization].

Early experience of minimally invasive coronary surgery with bilateral internal mammary artery

Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Directly Bypass Grafting With Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery and Conventional Off-pump Bypass Grafting for Treating Multi-vessel Lesion Coronary Artery Disease

Early and late outcomes after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass vs. full sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Clinical results of multi-artery-graft and single-artery-graft off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity score matching follow-up study

Off-pump minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: the lampang experience

One-Stop Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Experiences and lessons of minimally invasive single coronary artery bypass grafting——505 cases report in asingle institute

Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Early Results Of Multivessel Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting