Abstract:Abstract Background Narrative medicine is a well-recognized and respected approach to care. It is now found in medical school curricula and widely implemented in practice. However, there has been no analysis of the perception and usage of narrative medicine across different medical specialties and whether there may be unique recommendations for implementation based upon specialty. The aims of this study were to explore these gaps in research. Methods Fifteen senior physicians who specialize in internal medicine, pediatrics, or surgery (5 physicians from each specialty) were interviewed in a semi-structured format about the utilization, benefits, drawbacks (i.e., negative consequences), and roles pertaining to narrative medicine. Qualitative content analysis of each interview was then performed. Results Three themes emerged from our analysis: roles, practice, and outcomes. Through these themes we examined the importance, utilization, barriers, benefits, and drawbacks of narrative medicine. There was consensus that narrative medicine is an important tool in primary care. Primary care physicians (general internists and general pediatricians) also believed that narrative medicine is not as important for non-primary care providers. However, non-primary care providers (surgeons) generally believed narrative medicine is valuable in their practice as well. Within specialties, providers’ choice of language varied when trying to obtain patients’ narratives, but choice in when to practice narrative medicine did not differ greatly. Among specialties, there was more variability regarding when to practice narrative medicine and what barriers were present. Primary care physicians primarily described barriers to eliciting a patient’s narrative to involve trust and emotional readiness, while surgeons primarily described factors involving logistics and patient data as barriers to obtaining patients’ narratives. There was broad agreement among specialties regarding the benefits and drawbacks of narrative medicine. Conclusions This study sheds light on the shared and unique beliefs in different specialties about narrative medicine. It prompts important discussion around topics such as the stereotypes physicians may hold about their peers and concerns about time management. These data provide some possible ideas for crafting narrative medicine education specific to specialties as well as future directions of study.

Physicians practicing other occupations, especially literature

Literature and medicine: contributions to clinical practice

'Written of by novelists': scripting and managing emotions in 19th-century medical manuscripts

The role of literature in medical education

[The doctor as a literary character in the Modern Age]

Extracurricular pursuits

Poetry and Medicine

From“Literature and Medicine”to“Narrative Medicine”

The enactment of physician-authors in Nobel Prize nominations

The Fielding H. Garrison Lecture: Great Doctor History:

Moving Beyond the Doctor's Perspective of the Patient's Perspective

Sing, muse: songs in Homer and in hospital

Do Medical Students' Narrative Representations of "The Good Doctor" Change Over Time? Comparing Humanism Essays From a National Contest in 1999 and 2013

Close Reading and Creative Writing in Clinical Education: Teaching Attention, Representation, and Affiliation

Doctors who doctor self, family, and colleagues

[The marriage between the physician and philology]

Images of Traditional Chinese Medicine Doctors in Chinese Literature

Literary and Documentary Evidence for Lay Medical Practice in the Roman Republic and Empire

Exploring perception and usage of narrative medicine by physician specialty: a qualitative analysis

Literature and madness: fiction for students and professionals

On Doctors and Their Operas: A Critical (and Lyrical) Analysis of Medicine in Opera