Recapturing Space: New Middle‐range Theory in Spatial Demography. Frank M. Howell, Jeremy R. Porter and Stephen A. Matthews. Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland, 2016. ISBN: 978‐3‐319‐22810‐5.
Yang Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12344
2017-01-01
Journal of Regional Science
Abstract:Demography is at its core concerned with the evolution of population. Even though the evolution processes take place not only over time but also across space, theory, and models that integrate both ingredients have been rare, especially along the space dimension. With increasing attention paid to modeling both temporal and spatial dynamics in demography-related subjects, there are imperative and interesting questions to capture with regard to the status quo and future challenges of incorporating spatial analysis into theories. This edited volume contributes to answering these questions through providing clear examples of spatial thinking, the operationalization of spatial concepts, the construction of diverse spatial measures, and the adoption of spatial analytical models. The book contains three main parts: Theory, Concepts and Measures (Part I), Research Practice in Spatial Demography (Part II), and Middle Range Theory in Application (Part III). At the end of the book (Part IV), the three editors Howell, Matthews, and Porter discuss instructional resources and recapitalize the central concepts for Middle Range Theory. The diverse topics distributed over 18 chapters across multidisciplines such as demography, health economics, sociology, and political science mark this collection as an excellent exemplar of cross-fertilization from one discipline to another. Below, I offer a summary of the book, highlighting the key issues identified in each specific chapter. Based on a thorough review of Middle Range Theory in earlier sociology and demography literature, the authors in Part I Theory, Concepts and Measures (chapters 2–6) provide reflective spatial thoughts and delineate issues such as defining the scale of neighborhood, measuring the neighborhood characteristics, quantifying neighborhood effect, mitigating endogeneity, and identifying the spatial spillover mechanisms. Logan in chapter 2 points out that spatial concepts such as distance, proximity, and exposure are rooted in relative locations and they are incorporated into social research through the analysis of spatial clustering or social interaction. The author also reminds readers to be careful in interpreting the spatial lag coefficients, the magnitudes, and the significance of which are sensitive to the definition and scope of neighborhood. Siordia and Matthews (chapter 3) find that the spatial thinking and spatial analytical perspectives play increasingly important roles in analyzing demographic questions with complex patterns of interrelated social, economic, and environmental phenomena, and promote more thinking on the mechanisms linking people to places in multilevel models. In chapter 4, Brazil describes how space is captured in the individual- and neighborhood-level treatments by decomposing the total average effect into the natural direct effect, the natural individual indirect, and the neighborhood indirect effect. He notes that place-based policy interventions generate larger and more effective impact on a wider population, and may provide a more suitable testing ground for middle-range theories. Wong (chapter 5) and Weeks (chapter 6) close the first part by applying spatial methods to measuring segregation and other spatial demographic concepts in Ghana, West Africa. Both chapters emphasize the necessity and importance to gain geo-referenced data at different spatial scales to push forward the development of new Middle-Range Theory in spatial demography. Part II Research Practice in Spatial Demography contains two chapters reviewing literatures on the application of spatial concepts and tools within an interdisciplinary context. Mobley and Bazzoli (chapter 7) argue that with the improvements in GIS and spatial statistical methods, assuming “dependence of relevant alternatives” (DRA) instead of “independence of irrelevant alternatives” (IRA) in modeling hospital and healthcare provider choices will provide more insights in public policy evaluations. Darmofal and Strickler (chapter 8) reexamine The Big Sort—an influential book in political science, and posit that the spatial structure of the partisan sorting is missing and, by incorporating space into The Big Sort, spatial demographers can speak to political scientists over the shared concern of migration to provide us with more insights that can help remedy the negative effects of geographic polarization (p. 153). Part III Middle Range Theory in Application is a synthesis of empirical essays exploring diversified applications of Middle-Range Theory. Shin and Agnew (chapter 9) using the spatial lag model explore the linkage between Italian electoral participation and demographic characteristics. Working with the 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010 U.S. Census data, Porter and Howell (chapter 10) study the population redistribution, evolution, and clustering using the local indicators of spatial association (LISA). This is an interesting work crossing an intellectual divide between demography and rural sociology. Using the same dataset, Tolbert et al. (chapter 12) test whether the social capital, measured by an index of civic community, has declined over time. Those who are interested to study how and to what extent the spatial distribution shapes resource mobilization and network formation in social movements, will find chapter 11 by Irwin and Pischke useful. They provide an analytical framework using spatial gravity models in the case of the Marcellus environmental organizations. Yang et al. (chapter 13) apply the spatial Durbin model to geographic mortality disparities with the U.S. county-level data, and find that, to some degree, the paradox of lower mortality in rural than in urban areas might be a consequence of the spatial dynamic processes embedded in the data (p. 269, line 11). Kramer (chapter 14) provides a good example to define spatial scale in seven different ways and uses them as additional dimension to measure the linkage between social environments and pregnancy outcomes, which advances our understanding of place-health relationships. Chen (chapter 15) shows theoretical underpinnings of using nighttime geo-coded lights data as a proxy variable for economics statistics and an application to study the effect of urbanization on poverty rates. Parker, in chapter 16, first discusses “spatial synchrony”—an approach to analyze spatial correlations in time-series data, and then elaborates on issues of scale, new forms of data and research ethics related to spatial demography. Finally, Matthews (chapter 17) discusses integration of concepts, modeling strategies, and tests within the spatial framework and presents a rich set of instructional resources. Chapter 18 by Howell et al. summarizes what we know and what we need to know with regard to spatial theory and applications. The merit of the book lies in its cross-disciplinary view of incorporating spatial thinking and concepts into seemingly unrelated disciplines. An example of this appears in chapter 8 that brings together spatial demography and political science. Although the book is not a toolbox with a full list of modern spatial statistical methods, it is useful for me with an economics background and training. I become familiar with new topics and new data that cross the disciplinary boundary. This volume spares no effort to synthesize the spatial thoughts and concepts (chapters 2, 3, 6, 8, and 14), spatial measures (chapter 5, 10, and 11), analytical frameworks (chapters 4, 7, 9, 12, and 13), and new data (chapters 15 and 16) to blend theory with empirical work. By and large, Recapturing Space: New Middle-Range Theory in Spatial Demography, edited by Howell, Porter, and Matthews, is informative and enlightening to a varied audience, academic and practical, that is interested in the interaction between population and space, which echoes the old saying “a far-off relative is not as helpful as a near neighbor.”