Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma: a pitfall in the differential diagnosis of ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma
Amr Fadl,Andrew L Feldman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-023-00537-8
Abstract:An 18-year-old female presented with a 4.5 cm abdominal mass. Biopsy showed sheet-like growth of large tumor cells with round to oval nuclei, 1-2 nucleoli, and abundant cytoplasm. Immunohistochemistry showed strong, uniform CD30 staining and cytoplasmic ALK staining. B-cell markers (CD20, CD79a, PAX5, kappa/lambda) and T-cell markers (CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD43, granzyme B, T-cell receptor-β) were negative. Other hematopoietic markers (CD45, CD34, CD117, CD56, CD163, EBV) were negative, but CD138 was positive. Non-hematopoietic markers showed desmin positivity and negativity for S100, melan A, HBM45, PAX8, PAX2, WT1, MYO-D1, myogenin, pancytokeratin, and CAM5.2. Sequencing identified PRRC2B::ALK fusion. A diagnosis of epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma (EIMS) was made. EIMS is a rare, aggressive form of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor typically presenting in children and young adults. The tumor comprises large epithelioid cells that express ALK and often CD30. ALK-positive ALCL has a similar age range and also is a large-cell tumor expressing CD30 and ALK. Other ALK-positive neoplasms (e.g., carcinomas, ALK-positive large B-cell lymphoma, ALK-positive histiocytosis) typically lack CD30 and have distinct clinicopathologic features that aid diagnosis. Hematopathologists need to distinguish EIMS from ALK-positive ALCL, which frequently shows loss of pan-T-cell antigens. Careful morphologic evaluation for the hallmark cells of ALCL and comprehensive phenotyping are critical to avoid this diagnostic pitfall. If known, the ALK rearrangement partner gene may also provide diagnostic clues; for example PRRC2B::ALK and RANBP2::ALK occur in EIMS but not ALCL.