Abstract:A summary of the study design and participant flow through the study. (A) Flow chat of enrollment and treatment in the longitudinal experiment; (B) and (C) seed‐based analysis and network‐based analysis; (D) predicting the therapeutic effect of rTMS; Abbreviations: LOO, leave‐one‐out; CPM, connectome‐based predictive modeling; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Introduction Neuro‐navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective in alleviating cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the strategy for target determination and the mechanisms for cognitive improvement remain unclear. Methods One hundred and thirteen elderly subjects were recruited in this study, including both cross‐sectional (n = 79) and longitudinal experiments (the rTMS group: n = 24; the sham group: n = 10). The cross‐sectional experiment explored the precise intervention target based on the cortical–hippocampal network. The longitudinal experiment investigated the clinical efficacy of neuro‐navigated rTMS treatment over a four‐week period and explored its underlying neural mechanism using seed‐based and network‐based analysis. Finally, we applied connectome‐based predictive modeling to predict the rTMS response using these functional features at baseline. Results RTMS at a targeted site of the left angular gyrus (MNI: −45, −67, 38) significantly induced cognitive improvement in memory and language function (p

Multi‐networks connectivity at baseline predicts the clinical efficacy of left angular gyrus‐navigated rTMS in the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease: A sham‐controlled study