Abstract:Protein structure prediction can be used to determine the three-dimensional shape of a protein from its amino acid sequence<a href="/articles/s41586-019-1923-7#ref-CR1">1</a>. This problem is of fundamental importance as the structure of a protein largely determines its function<a href="/articles/s41586-019-1923-7#ref-CR2">2</a>; however, protein structures can be difficult to determine experimentally. Considerable progress has recently been made by leveraging genetic information. It is possible to infer which amino acid residues are in contact by analysing covariation in homologous sequences, which aids in the prediction of protein structures<a href="/articles/s41586-019-1923-7#ref-CR3">3</a>. Here we show that we can train a neural network to make accurate predictions of the distances between pairs of residues, which convey more information about the structure than contact predictions. Using this information, we construct a potential of mean force<a href="/articles/s41586-019-1923-7#ref-CR4">4</a> that can accurately describe the shape of a protein. We find that the resulting potential can be optimized by a simple gradient descent algorithm to generate structures without complex sampling procedures. The resulting system, named AlphaFold, achieves high accuracy, even for sequences with fewer homologous sequences. In the recent Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction<a href="/articles/s41586-019-1923-7#ref-CR5">5</a> (CASP13)—a blind assessment of the state of the field—AlphaFold created high-accuracy structures (with template modelling (TM) scores<a href="/articles/s41586-019-1923-7#ref-CR6">6</a> of 0.7 or higher) for 24 out of 43 free modelling domains, whereas the next best method, which used sampling and contact information, achieved such accuracy for only 14 out of 43 domains. AlphaFold represents a considerable advance in protein-structure prediction. We expect this increased accuracy to enable insights into the function and malfunction of proteins, especially in cases for which no structures for homologous proteins have been experimentally determined<a href="/articles/s41586-019-1923-7#ref-CR7">7</a>.

Protein structure prediction with in-cell photo-crosslinking mass spectrometry and deep learning

Modelling protein complexes with crosslinking mass spectrometry and deep learning

Improving AlphaFold 3 structural modeling by incorporating explicit crosslinks

Cross-linking mass spectrometry discovers, evaluates, and corroborates structures and protein–protein interactions in the human cell

Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning

Effective High-Accuracy Prediction of Protein Structures from Easily Obtainable Artificial Homologous Sequences by Structure-Stability-Based Selection

High-accuracy protein structures by combining machine-learning with physics-based refinement

Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

Protein complexes in cells by AI‐assisted structural proteomics

Predicting relative populations of protein conformations without a physics engine using AlphaFold2

Dissecting AlphaFolds Capabilities with Limited Sequence Information

High-throughput prediction of protein conformational distributions with subsampled AlphaFold2

The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins

Prediction of peptide structural conformations with AlphaFold2

Modeling flexible protein structure with AlphaFold2 and cross-linking mass spectrometry

AlphaFold 2: Why It Works and Its Implications for Understanding the Relationships of Protein Sequence, Structure, and Function

Predicting direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning

Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome

AI told you so: navigating protein structure prediction in the era of machine learning

AlphaFold 2 and NMR Spectroscopy: Partners to Understand Protein Structure, Dynamics and Function