Abstract:Understanding criminal activities, their structure and dynamics are fundamental for designing tools for crime prediction that can also guide crime prevention. Here, we study crimes committed in city community areas based on police crime reports and demographic data for the City of Chicago collected over 16 consecutive years. Our goal is to understand how the network of city community areas shapes dynamics of criminal offenses and demographic characteristics of their inhabitants. Our results reveal the presence of criminal hot-spots and expose the dynamic nature of criminal activities. We identify the most influential features for forecasting the per capita crime rate in each community. Our results indicate that city community crime is driven by spatio-temporal dynamics since the number of crimes committed in the past among the spatial neighbors of each community area and in the community itself are the most important features in our predictive models. Moreover, certain urban characteristics appear to act as triggers for the spatial spreading of criminal activities. Using the k-Means clustering algorithm, we obtained three clearly separated clusters of community areas, each with different levels of crimes and unique demographic characteristics of the district's inhabitants. Further, we demonstrate that crime predictive models incorporating both demographic characteristics of a community and its crime rate perform better than models relying only on one type of features. We develop predictive algorithms to forecast the number of future crimes in city community areas over the periods of one-month and one-year using varying sets of features. For one-month predictions using just the number of prior incidents as a feature, the critical length of historical data, τc, of 12 months arises. Using more than τc months ensures high accuracy of prediction, while using fewer months negatively impacts prediction quality. Using features based on demographic characteristics of the district's inhabitants weakens this impact somewhat. We also forecast the number of crimes in each community area in the given year. Then, we study in which community area and over what period an increase in crime reduction funding in this area will yield the largest reduction of the crime in the entire city. Finally, we study and compare the performance of various supervised machine learning algorithms classifying reported crime incidents into the correct crime category. Using the temporal patterns of various crime categories improves the classification accuracy. The methodologies introduced here are general and can be applied to other cities for which data about criminal activities and demographics are available.

A conditional machine learning classification approach for spatio-temporal risk assessment of crime data

A doubly stochastic point process approach for spatio-temporal dynamics of crime data

Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Urban Crime Leveraging Multisource Crowdsensed Data

Crime risk assessment through Cox and self-exciting spatio-temporal point processes

Crime risk prediction incorporating geographical spatiotemporal dependency into machine learning models

Crime Prediction Using Spatio-Temporal Data

Predicting Crime Using Spatial Features

Spatio-Temporal Low Count Processes with Application to Violent Crime Events

Prediction of Homicides in Urban Centers: A Machine Learning Approach

Crime prediction through urban metrics and statistical learning

Machine Learning for Public Good: Predicting Urban Crime Patterns to Enhance Community Safety

A Comparative Analysis of Multiple Methods for Predicting a Specific Type of Crime in the City of Chicago

A Spatially Correlated Model with Generalized Autoregressive Conditionally Heteroskedastic Structure for Counts of Crimes

Dynamic road crime risk prediction with urban open data

Enhancing short-term crime prediction with human mobility flows and deep learning architectures

ESCORT: Fine-Grained Urban Crime Risk Inference Leveraging Heterogeneous Open Data

Modeling Temporal-Spatial Correlations for Crime Prediction.

Crime Prediction Based On Crime Types And Using Spatial And Temporal Criminal Hotspots

Dynamics of crime activities in the network of city community areas

Crime Prediction with Historical Crime and Movement Data of Potential Offenders Using a Spatio-Temporal Cokriging Method

Exploring Spatio-Temporal and Cross-Type Correlations for Crime Prediction