Abstract:Problem Definition: As the usage of livestreaming as a shopping channel skyrocketed during Covid-19 lockdowns (especially in China), numerous brands started to leverage livestream selling to drive sales. This paper investigates a firm’s optimal livestream adoption strategies and implementation tactics and the implications of livestream adoption for influencers and consumers. Methodology/Results: We develop a game-theoretic model to understand the strategic interactions between the firm, influencer, and consumers. Our analysis yields several interesting and nontrivial insights. First, we find that livestream selling should only be adopted when the influencer can attract a considerable number of viewers (i.e., the social influence is large) and this requirement diminishes as the influencer becomes more capable of identifying the product quality accurately (i.e., the endorsement reliability is high). Second, we assert that livestream adoption needs to be accompanied by appropriate selections of both influencer and product. While a larger social influence is always preferred by the firm when selecting an influencer, a higher endorsement reliability may not be favorable. Furthermore, featuring products with a mediocre, rather than top-notch, quality can help exploit more value from livestream selling. Third, our analysis of commission fee design indicates that the influencer should be granted a reasonable revenue share because the influencer’s substantial “skin in the game” would reward the firm with more pricing flexibility. We further caution that introducing a slotting fee never benefits the firm and might even lead to a “lose-lose” outcome. Lastly, in search of good deals, it does not work for consumers to blindly follow influencers with a larger social influence or a higher endorsement reliability. Surprisingly, an increase in the influencer’s endorsement reliability can even lead to a “triple-worse” outcome for the firm, influencer, and consumers. Managerial Implications: Our paper lays out several important operational strategies firms have at their disposal to better experiment and invest in livestream selling, including pricing policy, influencer selection, product selection, and commission fee design.

Proportional incentive contracts in live streaming commerce supply chain based on target sales volume

Optimal contract design for live streaming shopping in a manufacturer–retailer–streamer supply chain

Optimal coordination contracts for manufacturer and streamer joint emission reduction and low-carbon publicity in a live-streaming supply chain

Dual channel sales in supply chain: live streaming or traditional e-commerce

Reselling or agency selling? The strategic role of live streaming commerce in distribution contract selection

Pricing and service effort strategy in live streaming commerce supply chain under the equal proportion settlement mode

Live-streaming selling modes on a retail platform

Optimal selling format considering price discount strategy in live-streaming commerce

Incentive Mechanism in Two-stage Service Supply Chains Based on the Revenue Sharing Contract

Incentive contract design considering quotas production: A principal-agent perspective

Live streaming e-commerce supply chain decisions considering dominant streamer under agency selling and reselling formats

Consumer engagement in live streaming commerce: Value co-creation and incentive mechanisms

Commit on Effort or Sales? Value of Commitment in Live-streaming E-commerce

A Model of Livestream Selling with Online Influencers

Design of Supply Chain Linear Shared-Saving Contract with Asymmetric Information

Contract and product quality in platform selling

Optimal marketing strategies for live streaming rooms in livestream e-commerce

Incentive mechanism in service supply chains based on wholesale price contract

Should manufacturers open live streaming shopping channels?

The Streamer's sales strategy choice considering sales effort

Externality of Contracts on Supply Chains with Two Suppliers and A Common Retailer