A structured simulation‐based mastery learning curriculum in chest tube insertion results in superior skills compared to traditional training programs

Leander De Mol,Isabelle Van Herzeele,Patrick Van de Voorde,Hanne Vanommeslaeghe,Lars Konge,Liesbeth Desender,Wouter Willaert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12439
IF: 3.282
2024-12-04
World Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Background Chest tube insertions (CTI) have a high complication rate, warranting a dedicated Simulation‐Based Mastery Learning (SBML) curriculum to acquire technical skills. This randomized controlled trial compares residents' skills in CTI after completing a SBML curriculum with those enrolled in a traditional residency program. Methods Junior residents were baseline tested on cognitive and technical skills (Thiel bodies) before randomization into an intervention and control group. The former deliberately trained CTI on a porcine rib model until passing a predefined pass/fail score and were then summatively tested on Thiel bodies. The latter had no additional training opportunities and was evaluated 3 months later. Results Seventeen residents were recruited and randomized. Following the per‐protocol principle, a significant interaction effect for Group × Procedure (F(1,14) = 6.2, p = 0.026) was observed. Between baseline and summative assessment, both the control group (28.0 ± 8.2 vs. 43.6 ± 8.1, p
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?