Retrospective Analysis of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Initiation Timing and Outcomes After Thrombolysis in High- and Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Adam Wolfe,Angela Phillips,David M Tierney,Roman Melamed,Ghazi Qadri,Matthew Lillyblad,Claire Smith,Catherine St. Hill,Ashley E Stenzel,David Beddow,Justin Kirven,Rajesh Kethireddy,Love Patel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296231156414
2023-03-10
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Abstract:Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, Volume 29, Issue , January-December 2023. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are prescribed in the treatment of venous thromboembolism, including pulmonary embolism (PE). Evidence is limited regarding the outcomes and optimal timing of DOACs in patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE treated with thrombolysis. We conducted a retrospective analysis of outcomes among patients with intermediate- and high-risk PE who received thrombolysis, by choice of long-term anticoagulant agent. Outcomes of interest included hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, bleeding, stroke, readmission, and mortality. Descriptive statistics were used to examine characteristics and outcomes among patients, by anticoagulation group. Patients receiving a DOAC (n = 53) had shorter hospital LOS compared to those in warfarin (n = 39) and enoxaparin (n = 10) groups (mean LOS 3.6, 6.3 and 4.5 days, respectively; P < .0001). This single institution retrospective study suggests DOAC initiation <48 h from thrombolysis may result in shorter hospital LOS compared to DOAC initiation ≥48 h (P < .0001). Further larger studies with more robust research methodology are needed to address this important clinical question.
peripheral vascular disease,hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?