Evaluation of Electrolytes Containing Flame Retardant Additives in LiNixCo1-xO2 and Li(Li0.17Ni0.25Mn0.58)O2-Based Li-Ion Cells
B. Lucht,M. Smart,Li Yang,S. Prakash,W. West,Kiah A. Smith,B. Ratnakumar,J. Soler,F. C. Krause
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2009-02/8/511
2009-07-10
Abstract:Many future NASA missions aimed at exploring the Moon and Mars require high specific energy rechargeable batteries that possess enhanced safety characteristics. Although Li-ion technology has been demonstrated to display good life characteristics, the ability to operate over a wide temperature range, and good power capability, under abuse conditions there is still a danger that some cell components can catch fire. Most notably, the stateof-practice electrolyte solutions consist of flammable organic solvents, including linear and cyclic carbonates (i.e., dimethyl carbonate, diethyl carbonate, ethyl methyl carbonate, and ethylene carbonate). Thus, many groups have focused upon the development of non-flammable electrolytes A number of technical approaches have been employed in the design of non-flammable electrolytes, including (i) the use of ionic liquids, (ii) the use of halogenated solvents, and (iii) the use of flame retardant additives (FRAs). Regarding the last approach, the investigation of phosphorus-based additives has received considerable attention, leading to the identification of a number promising FRAs which have been shown to have good cell compatibility and good flame retarding capabilities, including triphenyl phosphate, (TPP) tris(2,2,2trifluoroethyl)phosphate, and dimethyl methyl phosphonate. 3 In the current study, we have investigated a number of potential flame retardant additives in LiPF6-based electrolytes which contain mixtures of aliphatic carbonates, primarily ethylene carbonate and ethyl methyl carbonate. The FRAs investigated include, (a) triphenyl phosphate (TPP), (b) tributyl phosphate (TBP) , (c) triethyl phosphate (TEP) , (d) tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) phosphate, (e) bis(2,2,2trifluoroethyl) methyl phosphonate (TFMPo) , (f) diethyl ethylphosphonate, and (g) diethyl phenylphosphonate. (h) tris(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) phosphite, and (i) triphenylphosphite. In addition to the use of non-halogenated co-solvents, we have also investigated electrolytes which incorporate fluorinated esters, such as 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl butyrate (TFEB), which has demonstrated to have good characteristics in experimental Li-Ion cells and present the prospect of increased non-flammability. 7 The electrolytes described were evaluated in experimental three electrode lithium-ion cells (containing reference electrodes), consisting of MCMB carbon anodes and LiNi0.8Co0.2O2 cathodes, to study the effect that these additives have upon performance. These cells serve to verify and demonstrate the reversibility, low temperature performance, and electrochemical aspects of each electrode as determined from a number of electrochemical characterization techniques (EIS, DC micropolarization, and Tafel polarization). From these measurements, we were able to determine the influence of the respective FRAs upon the lithium intercalation/de-intercalation kinetics, as a function of temperature. Effort was also devoted to ascertaining whether any correlation could be discerned between the FRA structure and cell characteristics (i.e., reversibility and SEI characteristics). After performing the electrochemical measurements described and performing electrical characterization, including discharge rate testing and cycling tests, the electrodes were harvested for exsitu analysis at the University of Rhode Island (URI), using SEM, IR with ATR, and XPS. In addition to assessing the performance of these electrolytes in MCMB-LiNi0.8Co0.2O2 cells, some promising electrolytes formulations were evaluated in LiLi(Li0.17Ni0.25Mn0.58)O2 experimental cells to determine their high voltage compatibility.
Materials Science,Engineering,Chemistry