Abstract:No one enjoys grading, neither instructors nor students. The idea is that grades provide the required incentive to learn and act as an "objective" form of evaluation. This view is especially prevalent in STEM, where practitioners pride themselves in quantitative and objective measurements. However, the science of learning tells us that grades and ranking increase competition and stress, pushing learners to engage in tasks regardless of their effectiveness. Grades have been shown to suppress interest in learning, incentivize engagement in easier tasks, and produce shallower thinking. If wanting to learn is something students and faculty can agree on, how do we get there without grading? From psychology research, we know that feedback, separated from grades, along with opportunities to reattempt work without negative consequence, are powerful drivers of the intrinsic motivation to learn. In fact, feedback loops—trying something new, getting feedback, and making changes based on feedback - are a known developmental pathway to authentic learning. In this article, I describe an experiment with a form of ungrading that involves students in the co-creation of self-assessment criteria. The goal is to create learning feedback loops, incentivize learning for learning's sake, and give students some agency in the process of evaluation. This was conducted in an upper division Immunology course at a small liberal arts college. This paper outlines an iterative and dialogical process between students and instructional staff to craft a holistic set of criteria for the evaluation of learning. These criteria became the foundation for regular one-on-one conversations with students and a means to track progress over the semester. End-of-semester student feedback was overwhelmingly positive, citing increased motivation to learn, lower levels of anxiety, a less competitive environment, and growth as a learner. Among the few disadvantages cited were anxieties from grade ambiguity, fears about the process, and extra time, especially for the instructor. This paper highlights the ways in which this system aligns with psychosocial theories of learning, fostering an intrinsic motivation to learn utilizing principles of critical pedagogy and students as partners. It concludes with lessons learned from both the student and instructor viewpoint.

Unraveling the effects of rubrics and exemplars on student writing performance.

Comparative Study about the Impacts of Chinese Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Feedback and Teacher Feedback on Middle School Students’ Writing Practice

Effects of Rubrics on Academic Performance, Self-Regulated Learning, and self-Efficacy: a Meta-analytic Review

Improving Students With Rubric-Based Self-Assessment and Oral Feedback

The impact of self-assessment, planning and goal setting, and reflection before and after revision on student self-efficacy and writing performance

“FIVE COLOURED PENCILS” TECHNIQUE AS A SELF- AND PEER-ASSESSMENT TOOL

From copying to learning: using exemplars to engage students with assessment criteria and feedback

The impact of rubrics and scripts on self-regulation, self-efficacy and performance in collaborative problem-solving tasks

Peer Feedback Improves Students’ Academic Self-Concept in Higher Education

Should I grade or should I comment: Links among feedback, emotions, and performance

From Critique to Insight: Student Voices on English Writing Feedback

Fostering student agency and motivation: co-creation of a rubric for self-evaluation in an ungraded course

Supporting Peer Feedback on Learning Strategies: Effects on Self-Efficacy and Feedback Quality

Understanding the Difference Between Self-Feedback and Peer Feedback: A Comparative Study of Their Effects on Undergraduate Students' Writing Improvement

Examining the effects of self-regulated learning-based teacher feedback on English-as-a-foreign-language learners’ self-regulated writing strategies and writing performance

Examining the Effect of Peer and Self Assessment Practices on Writing Skills

Effects of teacher intervention and type of peer feedback on student writing revision

Evaluating the Efficacy of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Writing Development among Secondary Students in Bologna, Italy

The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment

Peer and self-assessment practices for writing across the curriculum: learner-differentiated effects on writing achievement

The Impact of Automated Evaluation Feedback on Students’ Writing Revision