Abstract:Abstract Early periods of history have demonstrated that enhanced economic development is fostered in instances where natural resources are abundant, hence averting the resource curse. In this vein, accelerated economic advancement is driven by a rigorous and proficient financial sector that efficiently utilises and allocates the economy’s natural resources. A strong financial system that transforms resources into advantages rests on an advanced technological innovation base, superior human capital, distinct foreign direct investment, powerful trade, and sustainable energy consumption. While this paper investigates the nexus of these factors, the specific purpose of this research is to examine the interactive impact of financial development and natural resource rents on carbon emissions in the new BRICS economies for the duration of 1990 to 2019. The panel data generalised least squares (GLS) and the panel-corrected standard error (PCSE) techniques are adopted. The Dumitrescu and Hurlin technique is used to establish causality. The study found a U-shaped association between economic growth and emissions. The findings prove that the financial development of financial institutions and the financial development of financial markets’ relationships with emissions are significantly positive. Natural resource rents, energy consumption, and human capital create a significantly positive relationship with emissions (mostly just positive for technological innovation). Conversely, the connection involving trade and carbon emissions is significantly negative (but mostly just negative for FDI). The interaction (s) intervening financial development of financial institutions and financial development of financial markets with natural resource rent significantly lowers emissions, respectively. The interaction parameter (financial development of financial institutions, natural resource rent, and financial development of financial markets) mixed with trade significantly adds emissions (positively insignificant with energy consumption). Contrarily, this factor mixed with human capital and technological innovation, respectively, is significantly negative (just negative for FDI). The Dumitrescu–Hurlin panel Granger causality outcomes are also outlined.

Does economic fitness matter in carbon emissions mitigation in BRICS countries?

A path towards carbon mitigation amidst economic policy uncertainty in BRICS: an advanced panel analysis

CO2 emissions in BRICS countries: what role can environmental regulation and financial development play?

The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO2 emissions: evidence from the BRICS countries

Green innovation, foreign investment and carbon emissions: a roadmap to sustainable development via green energy and energy efficiency for BRICS economies

Impact of Renewable Energy, Business Climate, and Human Capital on CO2 Emissions: Empirical Evidence from BRICS Countries

Does economic prosperity lead to environmental sustainability in developing economies? Environmental Kuznets curve theory

Does energy efficiency improve environmental quality in BRICS countries? Empirical evidence using dynamic panels with heterogeneous slopes

Novel Research Methods for Estimating the Impact of Energy Use on Ecological Environment: Evidence from B.R.I.C.S. Economies

Exploring the impact of renewable energy, green taxes and trade openness on carbon neutrality: New insights from BRICS countries

Does Financial Inclusion Promote a Green Economic System? Evaluating the Role of Energy Efficiency

Economic growth, technology, and CO2 emissions in BRICS: Investigating the non-linear impacts of economic complexity

The nexus of financial development, natural resource rents, technological innovation, foreign direct investment, energy consumption, human capital, and trade on environmental degradation in the new BRICS economies

Retraction Note: Does energy consumption, economic growth, urbanization, and population growth influence carbon emissions in the BRICS? Evidence from panel models robust to cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity.

Does energy consumption, economic growth, urbanization, and population growth influence carbon emissions in the BRICS? Evidence from panel models robust to cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity

The non-linear influence of trade, foreign direct investment, financial development, energy supply and human capital on carbon emissions in the BRICS

Economic performance and carbon emissions: revisiting the role of tourism and energy efficiency for BRICS economies

Asymmetric effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions of BRICS economies: evidence from nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag model

The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries

International trade and consumption‐based carbon emissions: Does energy efficiency and financial risk ensure sustainable environment?

Does agriculture, forests, and energy consumption foster the carbon emissions and ecological footprint? fresh evidence from BRICS economies