Abstract:Greenhouse-gas (GHG) reporting schemes for companies are increasingly part of climate-mitigation policies worldwide. Notably, the European Green Deal (2019) boosts new public regulations that oblige companies to compile GHG emission inventories, i.e., account for their emissions in a given system boundary. Along with this boost, the workload for companies increases; at the same time, the quality of reporting is questioned. Given the overarching goal to improve companies' climate-mitigation performance, the quality of reporting is inseparably connected to the quality of the respective accounting. However, the literature discusses carbon accounting as a universal umbrella term focusing on managerial issues, thus disregarding the crucial role of accounting methodologies in the sense of calculation approaches. In this publication, we apply an analytical approach introducing a clear differentiation between the task of quantitatively accounting for GHG inventories and the task of reporting results from calculated inventories in response to stakeholder or policy expectations. We use this approach to investigate European GHG reporting schemes and related GHG accounting methodologies in detail. Our findings indicate that the current phase of the European Green Deal depicts a quantitative growth in reporting schemes and a significant qualitative change by shifting from formerly voluntary to mandatory reporting schemes, along with the application of accounting methodologies originally not intended for politically compulsory purposes. We analyze the consequences of this shift, which poses new challenges for companies and policymakers, i.e., data-management concepts and refined methodological frameworks.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore how the new EU greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting system challenges corporate accounting and proposes solutions to these issues. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Background**: - Globally, corporate GHG reporting systems have become an essential part of climate mitigation policies. - The European Green Deal (2019) has driven new public regulations requiring companies to compile GHG emission inventories, i.e., to account for their emissions within specific system boundaries. 2. **Issues**: - With the implementation of these new regulations, the reporting workload for companies has increased, while the quality of the reports is being questioned. - Existing carbon accounting concepts mainly focus on management issues, neglecting the importance of accounting methods in calculation methods. - The relationship between reporting and accounting is complex, lacking systematic analysis and understanding. 3. **Objectives**: - Improve corporate climate mitigation performance and enhance report quality. - Distinguish and clarify the tasks of quantifying GHG inventories from the tasks of reporting results to stakeholders or policymakers. - Analyze the specific characteristics and interactions of the current EU GHG reporting system and its related accounting methods. 4. **Methods**: - Conduct a detailed study of the European GHG reporting system and related accounting methods through historical development, classification, and key feature analysis. - Introduce an analytical framework to decompose carbon accounting and reporting practices, describing their historical evolution, key representative classifications, and analyzing their specific characteristics. - Discuss the interactions between reporting and accounting across different dimensions, including the implementation of data management systems. 5. **Conclusions**: - The current phase of the European Green Deal shows a significant increase in the number of reporting systems, shifting from voluntary to mandatory reporting, while applying accounting methods that were not originally intended for political enforcement purposes. - This shift presents new challenges for companies and policymakers, requiring new data management and improved methodological frameworks. ### Summary The main problem the paper attempts to solve is how the new EU GHG reporting system challenges corporate accounting and proposes solutions to these challenges to improve report quality and corporate climate mitigation performance. By systematically analyzing the relationship between reporting and accounting, the paper provides practitioners with better understanding and methodological support.

Back in the Driver's Seat: How New EU Greenhouse-Gas Reporting Schemes Challenge Corporate Accounting

Carbon accounting for sustainability and management. Status quo and challenges

Carbon Accounting Measurement with Digital Non-Financial Corporate Reporting and a Comparison to European Automotive Companies Statements

Corporate Carbon and Climate Accounting

Principles for accurate GHG inventories and options for market-based accounting

Abominable greenhouse gas bookkeeping casts serious doubts on climate intentions of oil and gas companies

Do's and Don'ts in Climate Impact Assessment of University Campuses: Towards Responsible, Transparent and Comprehensive Reporting †

Climate change and business accountability, empirical evidence on the roles of environmental strategy and environmental accounting

How to Fix ESG Reporting

Analysis of Carbon Emission Accounting Practices of Leading Carbon Emitting European Union Companies

Accounting for Carbon Emissions Among Large U.S. Companies: Does Materiality Matter

3-Levers of Emission Control-Modeling Framework: Modeling GHG Emissions When Direct Measurement is not Possible

Towards a unified carbon accounting landscape

Factors influencing the development and implementation of national greenhouse gas inventory methodologies

Twenty years of carbon accounting and auditing – a review and outlook

Carbon Emission Statements: Balance Sheets and Flow Statements

Emerging reporting and verification needs under the Paris Agreement: How can the research community effectively contribute?

Carbon Footprint Accounting for General Goods—A Comparison

Towards standardized grid emission factors: methodological insights and best practices

Past, present, and future of carbon accounting: Insights from scholarly research

Relationship Between Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Accounting Variables According to the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis