Learning from the impact of misinformation and past infodemics: advancing public health through transparency, trust, and community engagement

Tristan T. Timbrook,Andrea M. Prinzi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2024.2361071
2024-06-01
Infectious Diseases
Abstract:In their recent analysis in The Lancet Infectious Diseases , Sabrina Jin and colleagues performed a narrative review of secondary historical sources to evaluate past infodemics of misinformation, including smallpox, cholera, 1918 influenza, and HIV [ Citation 1 ]. This historical review effectively highlights how sociopolitical issues create a fertile breeding ground for mistrust and the exacerbation of vulnerabilities, which, when paired with delay in scientific consensus and rapid flow of information via the media, can lead to public health misinformation integration with significant consequences. Currently, we are reminded of another example of the insidious impact of misinformation as measles cases reach staggering levels globally [ Citation 2 ]. As of 2023, the World Health Organisation (WHO) reports that global measles cases have increased 18% since 2022. Globally, deaths have increased 43% since 2021, primarily among children, despite the availability of a safe and effective MMR vaccine [ Citation 2 ]. The publication of Andrew Wakefield's flawed study on the link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and the development of autism is a stunning example of the far-reaching effects of misinformation and has been directly implicated in rising measles rates and vaccine hesitancy. Four years after its publication, the Wakefield study was highlighted in a British Broadcasting Company (BBC) special that questioned the safety of the MMR vaccine. Studies analysing the impact of media dissemination of the Wakefield study findings demonstrate that the public's understanding of the MMR vaccine was established in only one month, during significant media scrutiny [ Citation 3 ]. While studies demonstrate that the public retained key themes that were reiterated during this period (e.g. vaccines cause autism), nuanced information was lost [ Citation 3 ]. Furthermore, the news media has been cited as a primary source of vaccine information for parents [ Citation 3 ]. During the early 2000s, the MMR vaccine's perceived safety increased when media coverage decreased, followed by decreases when media coverage increased [ Citation 3 ]. This spread of misinformation is supported by the accessibility and dissemination potential of social media, as well as complex political climates and psychological factors and beliefs such as "purity" and "liberty" [ Citation 4 ]. Today, MMR vaccine misinformation rages on despite the retraction of the Wakefield study and the culmination of significant evidence that the MMR vaccine is not associated with autism and the retraction of the original study.
infectious diseases
What problem does this paper attempt to address?