Determinants and Prognoses of Visual-Functional Mismatches After Mechanical Reperfusion in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Jieliang Liu,Junguo Jin,Bingyan Yu,Shanghong Zhang,Xiaoqi Lu,Guoqiang Chen,Yi Yang,Haojian Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s444933
IF: 2.145
2024-02-28
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Jieliang Liu, 1, &ast Junguo Jin, 1, &ast Bingyan Yu, 2 Shanghong Zhang, 2 Xiaoqi Lu, 1 Guoqiang Chen, 2 Yi Yang, 2 Haojian Dong 1, 3 1 Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China; 3 Nyingchi People's Hospital, Nyingchi, Tibet, 860000, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Haojian Dong, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China, Email Yi Yang, Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China, Email Background: Discordance between the anatomy and physiology of the coronary has important implications for managing patients with stable coronary disease, but its significance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction has not been fully elucidated. Methods: The retrospective study involved patients diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), along with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and quantitative flow ratio (QFR) assessments. Patients were stratified into four groups regarding the severity of the culprit vessel, both visually and functionally: concordantly negative (QCA-diameter stenosis [DS] ≤ 50% and QFR > 0.80), mismatch (QCA-DS > 50% and QFR > 0.80), reverse mismatch (QCA-DS ≤ 50% and QFR ≤ 0.80), and concordantly positive (QCA-DS > 50% and QFR ≤ 0.80). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the clinical factors linked to visual-functional mismatches. Kaplan‒Meier analysis was conducted to estimate the 18-month adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival between the four groups. Results: The study involved 310 patients, with 68 presenting visual-functional mismatch, and 51 exhibiting reverse mismatch. The mismatch was associated with higher angiography-derived microcirculatory resistance (AMR) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.016, 95% CI: 1.010– 1.022, P< 0.001). Reverse mismatch was associated with larger area stenosis (aOR=1.044, 95% CI: 1.004– 1.086, P=0.032), lower coronary flow velocity (aOR=0.690, 95% CI: 0.567– 0.970, P< 0.001) and lower AMR (aOR=0.947, 95% CI: 0.924– 0.970, P< 0.001). Additionally, the mismatch group showed the worst 18-month MACE-free survival among the four groups (Log rank test p = 0.013). Conclusion: AMR plays a significant role in the occurrence of visual-functional mismatches between QCA-DS and QFR, and the mismatch group showed the worst prognosis. Keywords: ST-elevation myocardial infarction, quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative flow ratio, angiography-derived microcirculatory resistance Mismatches between visual and functional coronary lesion severity have been commonly observed in previous studies. In a previous study, visual-functional mismatches were observed in more than one-third of the study population with moderate coronary stenosis. 1 Such mismatches have consistently been a crucial element in patient management, who undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). And the identified visual-functional mismatches could potentially inform risk stratification and guide prognostic and therapeutic decisions for patients with coronary disease in the future. According to previous studies, many factors play significant roles in visual-functional discordance, including age, sex, lesion location, plaque burden, presence/absence of plaque rupture, angiographical lesion-related indices, and physiological function. 2–4 Besides clinical features and laboratory indicators, microvascular function potentially also has a significant influence on visual-functional discordance, underscoring the cruciality of physiological assessment of coronary flow. 5 However, Tomoyo Sugiyama MD et al found that microvascular function was not related to the prevalence of visual-functional discordance in intermediate-to-severe stable lesions. 6 At present, the mechanism behind this discordance remains to be completely clarified, especially concerning the importance of microvascular function. Additionally, previous studies on visual-func -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?