Thermal Comfort and Indoor Overheating Risks of Urban Building Stock - A Review of Modelling Methods and Future Climate Challenges
Richard Dean Morales,Amaryllis Audenaert,Stijn Verbeke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112363
IF: 7.093
2024-12-02
Building and Environment
Abstract:Urban microclimate often exhibits higher temperatures than rural areas due to Urban Heat Island (UHI). While UHI reflects outdoor overheating risks, people spend most of their time indoors, where thermal conditions are shaped by complex interactions of external weather, building characteristics, and human behaviour. Thus, UHI effects do not straightforwardly translate to indoor temperature increases. The intricacies of assessing indoor overheating risks in urban settings can be captured using Urban Building Energy Modelling (UBEM) with Building Performance Simulation (BPS). This paper reviews the latest research on BPS in an urban context, offering critical analysis and identifying challenges to guide future research. Conventionally, UBEM has primarily focused on energy simulation rather than indoor thermal comfort. Also, it often uses a generic approach, modelling a limited set of archetype buildings. This simplification can result in suboptimal climate adaptation and mitigation strategies, as indoor thermal comfort depends on specific building conditions like microclimate, window size, orientation, and shading. However, recent advances in UBEM have begun incorporating microclimate data and climate change scenarios. New thermal comfort metrics tailored to climate change are emerging, building upon existing standards. Progress has been made in modelling significant factors affecting building heat balance, including the generation of multizone models, incorporation of trees and vegetation, and improved calculations of longwave radiation and surface albedo. Despite this progress, current research often focuses on a limited set of these factors and the relative contribution to the UBEM model outcomes is often not quantified. Future endeavours should strive for explicit quantification and efficient integration of these interacting elements within urban models, balancing the modelling complexity with computational demands while improving simulation accuracy. Limitations may arise from data availability, necessitating the adoption of alternative data sources and novel modelling techniques. Ultimately, enhanced assessments of urban-level indoor overheating will support better-informed urban planning and building design strategies, bolstering resilience against overheating.
engineering, environmental,construction & building technology, civil