Abstract:Purpose Typically developing children assigned male at birth (AMAB) and children assigned female at birth (AFAB) produce the fricative /s/ differently: AFAB children produce /s/ with a higher spectral peak frequency. This study examined whether implicit knowledge of these differences affects speech‐language pathologists'/speech and language therapists' (SLPs'/SLTs') ratings of /s/ accuracy, by comparing ratings made in conditions where SLPs/SLTs were blind to children's sex assigned at birth (SAB) to conditions in which they were told this information. Methods SLPs (n = 95) varying in clinical experience rated the accuracy of word‐initial /s/ productions (n = 87) of eight children with speech sound disorder in one of four conditions: one in which no information about the children was revealed, one in which children's SAB was revealed, one in which children's age was revealed, and one in which both were revealed. Results Despite there being no statistically significant differences between AFAB and AMAB children's /s/ production in researcher‐determined accuracy or in one acoustic characteristic, spectral centroid, SLPs in all four conditions judged the /s/ productions of AFAB children as more accurate than AMAB children. Listeners were significantly less likely to judge the productions of AMAB children to be inaccurate in the conditions in which age or age and SAB were revealed. These effects were consistent across SLPs with greatly varying levels of clinical experience. Conclusion Knowing or imputing children's age and SAB can affect ratings of /s/ accuracy. Clinicians should be mindful of these potential effects. Future research should understand how expectations about sociolinguistic variation in speech affect appraisals of their speech and language. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Adult men and women produce /s/ differently. A consensus is that these differences reflect sociolinguistic gender marking, rather than being the passive consequence of vocal‐tract differences. Recent studies have shown that children assigned female at birth (AFAB) and those assigned male at birth (AMAB) produce /s/ differently in ways that mirror the differences between adult men and women, and which presumably reflect gender marking. What this paper adds to existing knowledge We asked whether US‐based speech‐language pathologists' (SLPs) ratings of the accuracy of /s/ differ depending on whether they are rating an AFAB or an AMAB child, and whether these differences are greater in conditions in which people are told the sex assigned at birth of the child being rated. We found that SLPs were more likely to judge AFAB children's /s/ productions to be more accurate than AMAB children's, even though the productions from the AMAB and AFAB children that were used as stimuli were matched for accuracy as determined by trained researchers. What are the clinical implications of this work? SLPs/speech‐language therapists should be sensitive to the influence of social variables when assessing /s/. SLPs/speech‐language therapists might rate children's productions differently depending on whether they believe they are rating an AFAB or an AMAB child.

Third person pronoun errors by children with and without language impairment

Analysis and Teaching Strategies of Middle School English Pronouns from a Cross-culture Perspective

Exploring the Cause of English Pronoun Gender Errors by Chinese Learners of English: Evidence from the Self-paced Reading Paradigm

Grammatical Verb Errors: Differences Between English Learners With and Without Diagnosed Language-Based Learning Disabilities

Multifunctional personal pronoun use in an educational setting

Pronoun comprehension in individuals with Down syndrome: the role of age

Analysis of accuracy in the writing of EFL students enrolled on CLIL and non-CLIL programmes: the impact of grade and gender

Rate of speech affects the comprehension of pronouns in children with developmental language disorder

Pronoun Anaphora and Children's Developing Abilities to Backward Reference in Criminal Cases of Alleged Child Sexual Abuse

Ambiguous pronoun use in narratives of children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Grammatical morphology is not a sensitive marker of language impairment in Icelandic in children aged 4-14 years

Of Mouses and Mans: A Test of Errorless Versus Error‐Based Learning in Children

Specific Language Impairment and Early Second Language Acquisition: The Risk of Over- and Underdiagnosis

Grammatical characteristics of Swedish children with SLI

PERSONAL PRONOUN ERRORS IN TRANSLATING SIMPLE SENTENCES FROM BAHASA INDONESIA TO ENGLISH

Composition of preverbal message: Gender errors of English pronouns by Chinese learners of English

Morphological Errors in Spanish-Speaking Bilingual Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorders

Linguistic illusions and misconceptions: The role of language variation in language development across three varieties of American English

ERROR ANALYSIS ON PRONOUN MADE BY THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA KATOLIK CINTA KASIH TEBING TINGGI IN ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2020/2021

Gender and age biases in the assessment of speech accuracy: A study of speech‐language clinicians' ratings of /s/ accuracy

Substitution Errors and the Role of Markedness in Bilingual Phonological Acquisition