Ambient Air Pollution and Preeclampsia
Hui Hu,Jiang Bian,Jinying Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.119.13269
IF: 9.8968
2020-01-01
Hypertension
Abstract:HomeHypertensionVol. 75, No. 3Ambient Air Pollution and Preeclampsia Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAmbient Air Pollution and PreeclampsiaLooking Back and Moving Forward Hui Hu, Jiang Bian and Jinying Zhao Hui HuHui Hu Correspondence to Hui Hu, Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Rd, CTRB 4224, Gainesville, FL 32610. Email E-mail Address: [email protected] From the Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine (H.H., J.Z.) The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association. Search for more papers by this author , Jiang BianJiang Bian Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville (J.B.). Search for more papers by this author and Jinying ZhaoJinying Zhao Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville (J.B.). Search for more papers by this author Originally published6 Jan 2020https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13269Hypertension. 2020;75:618–619This article is a commentary on the followingWintertime Wood Smoke, Traffic Particle Pollution, and PreeclampsiaOther version(s) of this articleYou are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions: January 6, 2020: Ahead of Print See related article, pp 851–858Preeclampsia is a common pregnancy complication and a top contributor to maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality,1 affecting 2% to 8% of all pregnancies globally. Ambient particulate matter air pollution has been recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population,2 and recent meta-analyses suggested that ambient particulate matter and gaseous air pollution are associated with increased odds of preeclampsia.3 Although the biological mechanisms underlying the association between air pollution and preeclampsia are largely unknown, several potential pathways have been suggested,3 including inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and more recently DNA methylation (Figure).4Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure. Potential mechanisms underlying the associations between air pollution and preeclampsia.However, significant knowledge gaps exist in the current literature. First, although it is widely recognized that preeclampsia with different onset and severity has distinct pathogenic mechanisms as well as maternal and fetal complications,5 few studies have examined the association between air pollution and the onset and severity of preeclampsia.3 Second, limited research has been conducted to assess the impact of source-specific air pollutants or to identify critical windows of exposure for preeclampsia. Such information may enhance our understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms and help inform the design of more targeted preventive strategies.In this issue of Hypertension, Assibey-Mensah et al6 used electronic medical records with linked birth certificate data on 16 116 pregnant women from 2 hospitals in Monroe County, New York, during 2009 to 2013 to examine the association between wintertime fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and preeclampsia. The authors determined early- and late-onset preeclampsia using the date of clinical diagnosis or gestational age at time of diagnosis. The data were then linked with source-specific ambient PM2.5 estimated by land-use regression models to generate women’s month-specific exposures. The authors found that exposure to PM2.5, wood smoke, and traffic pollution in early pregnancy during winter was associated with increased odds of early-onset preeclampsia.This study represents one of the first efforts to bridge several critical gaps by considering the onset of preeclampsia, assessing source-specific PM2.5, and identifying critical windows of exposure. It also shows several challenges in the field to move this line of research forward. First, when stratifying preeclampsia by its onset or severity, the low incidence rate in each category dramatically decreases statistical power, making it hard to be studied in traditional pregnancy and birth cohorts. Similar to Assibey-Mensah et al,6 many studies in the field utilized electronic medical records data and administrative data such as birth certificates. Although these real-world data are increasingly available, challenges remain in algorithmically determining and extracting phenotypes from these complex data sets with not only structured (eg, diagnosis codes) but also richer unstructured (eg, physician notes) information. Diagnosis codes-based case definitions are known to have varying misclassification errors across many disease areas, including hypertension.7 Leveraging the rich information other than just the diagnosis codes, especially the unstructured clinical notes, can drastically increase the accuracy of these computable phenotypes.8 More efforts on developing standardized, automated, and computerized phenotype algorithms are needed to minimize potential misclassifications. Second, although some modeled estimates of the 6 criteria air pollutants at high spatiotemporal resolutions are publicly available,9 limited resources exist for source-specific particulate matter air pollution, which usually relies on data collected from stationary monitors. Future efforts are needed to explore innovative methods such as integrations of multisource data (eg, stationary monitored data and remote sensing data) to assess source-specific particulate matter with large spatiotemporal coverages and high resolutions. Third, despite the existence of statistical methods to account for autocorrelated time-varying exposures such as distributed lag models and survival models with time-varying covariates and coefficients, they have not been widely used in studying ambient air pollution and preeclampsia. Future studies need to implement these methods to identify susceptible windows of exposure.In summary, the study by Assibey-Mensah et al6 is a critical first step in understanding how source-specific PM2.5 may impact the onset of preeclampsia. Moving forward, several gaps need to be addressed. First, it would be critical to conduct mechanistic studies to examine the molecular mechanisms such as epigenetic factors in mediating the association between ambient air pollution and preeclampsia and to elucidate the biological mechanisms underlying the potential differential effects of air pollution exposure on preeclampsia with different onset. Second, more advanced approaches need to be implemented to examine the joint effects of air pollution mixtures on preeclampsia.10 Third, more studies are warranted to examine the impact of pregnancy air pollution exposure on women’s cardiovascular health (CVH) during and after pregnancy. Although many studies have examined the association between air pollution and pregnancy complications, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus, no study has assessed the potential impact of air pollution on CVH among pregnant women. A recent study reported that a better CVH in pregnancy was associated with a better CVH and a lower cardiovascular disease risk 10 years postpartum,11 suggesting that pregnancy may be a prime time to promote CVH among women. Given the increased odds of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus associated with air pollution, it is plausible that air pollution may impact pregnancy CVH, even among those without any pregnancy complication. In addition, previous studies showed that women with a history of preeclampsia have around 2× higher risk of cardiovascular disease later in life compared with those without preeclampsia.12 However, no epidemiological study has examined the potential long-term cardiovascular impact of air pollution exposure during pregnancy. Further investigation is warranted to address these gaps in existing literature.Sources of FundingH. Hu’s work was supported by the Scientist Development Grant (17SDG33630165) from the American Heart Association. J. Bian’s work was supported by the University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute, which is supported in part by the National Institute of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences under award number UL1TR001427. J. Zhao’s work was supported by the National Institute of Health under award number R01DK107532, RF1AG052476, and R01MH097018.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.Correspondence to Hui Hu, Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, 2004 Mowry Rd, CTRB 4224, Gainesville, FL 32610. Email [email protected]eduReferences1. Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia.Semin Perinatol. 2009; 33:130–137. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.010CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Brook RD, Rajagopalan S, Pope CA, Brook JR, Bhatnagar A, Diez-Roux AV, Holguin F, Hong Y, Luepker RV, Mittleman MA, et al; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2010; 121:2331–2378. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1LinkGoogle Scholar3. Hu H, Ha S, Roth J, Kearney G, Talbott EO, Xu X. Ambient air pollution and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Atmos Environ (1994). 2014; 97:336–345. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.027CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Abraham E, Rousseaux S, Agier L, Giorgis-Allemand L, Tost J, Galineau J, Hulin A, Siroux V, Vaiman D, Charles MA, et al; EDEN mother-child cohort study group. Pregnancy exposure to atmospheric pollution and meteorological conditions and placental DNA methylation.Environ Int. 2018; 118:334–347. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.05.007CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Gagliardi G, Novelli GP. Early and late preeclampsia: two different maternal hemodynamic states in the latent phase of the disease.Hypertension. 2008; 52:873–880. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.117358LinkGoogle Scholar6. Assibey-Mensah V, Glantz JC, Hopke PK, Jusko TA, Thevenet-Morrison K, Chalupa D, Rich DQ. Wintertime wood smoke, traffic particle pollution, and preeclampsia.Hypertension. 2020; 75:851–858. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13139LinkGoogle Scholar7. Quan H, Khan N, Hemmelgarn BR, Tu K, Chen G, Campbell N, Hill MD, Ghali WA, McAlister FA; Hypertension Outcome and Surveillance Team of the Canadian Hypertension Education Programs. Validation of a case definition to define hypertension using administrative data.Hypertension. 2009; 54:1423–1428. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.139279LinkGoogle Scholar8. Mo H, Thompson WK, Rasmussen LV, Pacheco JA, Jiang G, Kiefer R, Zhu Q, Xu J, Montague E, Carrell DS, et al. Desiderata for computable representations of electronic health records-driven phenotype algorithms.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22:1220–1230. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv112CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Kim S, Bechle M, Hankey S, Sheppard L, Szpiro A, Marshall J. Concentrations of criteria pollutants in the contiguous us, 1979–2015: role of model parsimony in integrated empirical geographic regression: University of Washington biostatistics working paper series; 2018.Working Paper. https://biostats.bepress.com/uwbiostat/paper425Google Scholar10. Coull B, Bobb J, Wellenius G, Kioumourtzoglou M, Mittleman M, Koutrakis P, Godleski J. Part 1. Statistical learning methods for the effects of multiple air pollution constituents.Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2015;183 Pt 1-2:5–50.MedlineGoogle Scholar11. Benschop L, Schalekamp-Timmermans S, Schelling SJC, Steegers EAP, Roeters van Lennep JE. Early pregnancy cardiovascular health and subclinical atherosclerosis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8:e011394. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011394LinkGoogle Scholar12. Wu P, Haththotuwa R, Kwok CS, Babu A, Kotronias RA, Rushton C, Zaman A, Fryer AA, Kadam U, Chew-Graham CA. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017; 10:e003497. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003497LinkGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Hu H, Zhao J, Savitz D, Prosperi M, Zheng Y and Pearson T (2020) An external exposome-wide association study of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, Environment International, 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105797, 141, (105797), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2020. Related articlesWintertime Wood Smoke, Traffic Particle Pollution, and PreeclampsiaVanessa Assibey-Mensah, et al. Hypertension. 2020;75:851-858 March 2020Vol 75, Issue 3 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics © 2020 American Heart Association, Inc.https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13269PMID: 31902251 Originally publishedJanuary 6, 2020 PDF download Advertisement SubjectsEpidemiologyPreeclampsiaPregnancy