Abstract:RNAi-based genetically engineered (GE) crops for the management of insect pests are likely to be commercialized by the end of this decade. Without a workable framework for conducting the ecological risk assessment (ERA) and a standardized ERA protocol, however, the utility of RNAi transgenic crops in pest management remains uncertain. The overall goal of this study is to assess the risks of RNAi-based GE crops on a non-target soil micro-arthropod, Sinella curviseta, which could be exposed to plant-protected dsRNAs deposited in crop residues. Based on the preliminary research, we hypothesized that insecticidal dsRNAs targeting at the western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, a billion-dollar insect pest, has no adverse impacts on S. curviseta, a soil decomposer. Following a tiered approach, we tested this risk hypothesis using a well-designed dietary RNAi toxicity assay. To create the worst-case scenario, the full-length cDNA of v-ATPase subunit A from S. curviseta were cloned and a 400 bp fragment representing the highest sequence similarity between target pest and non-target arthropods was selected as the template to synthesize insecticidal dsRNAs. Specifically, 10-days-old S. curviseta larvae were subjected to artificial diets containing v-ATPase A dsRNAs from both D. v. virgifera (dsDVV) and S. curviseta (dsSC), respectively, a dsRNA control, β-glucuronidase, from plant (dsGUS), and a vehicle control, H2O. The endpoint measurements included gene expression profiles, survival, and life history traits, such as developmental time, fecundity, hatching rate, and body length. Although, S. curviseta larvae developed significantly faster under the treatments of dsDVV and dsSC than the vehicle control, the combined results from both temporal RNAi effect study and dietary RNAi toxicity assay support the risk hypothesis, suggesting that the impacts of ingested arthropod-active dsRNAs on this representative soil decomposer are negligible.

Problem Formulation for Off-Target Effects of Externally Applied Double-Stranded RNA-Based Products for Pest Control

Assessing the Risks of Topically Applied dsRNA-Based Products to Non-target Arthropods

A Perspective on RNAi-Based Biopesticides

Silence is not always golden: A closer look at potential environmental and ecotoxicological impacts of large-scale dsRNA application

Efficiency, Safety Concerns and Risk Assessment

Biosafety aspects of RNAi‐based pests control

RNAi-based pest control: Production, application and the fate of dsRNA

RNAi-Based Insecticidal Crops: Potential Effects on Nontarget Species

Implementation of RNAi-based arthropod pest control: environmental risks, potential for resistance and regulatory considerations

Double-Stranded RNA Technology to Control Insect Pests: Current Status and Challenges

Considerations and Regulatory Approaches in the USA and in the EU for dsRNA-Based Externally Applied Pesticides for Plant Protection

DsRNA-based pesticides: Considerations for efficiency and risk assessment

Strategies for the production of dsRNA biocontrols as alternatives to chemical pesticides

RNA meets toxicology: efficacy indicators from the experimental design of RNAi studies for insect pest management

Summary of Discussions From the 2019 OECD Conference on RNAi Based Pesticides

Using Transcriptome Shannon Entropy to Evaluate the Off-Target Effects and Safety of Insecticidal Sirnas

Ecological Risk Assessment of Nano-enabled Pesticides: A Perspective on Problem Formulation

Development and Evaluation of RNA Microsphere-Based RNAi Approaches for Managing the Striped Flea Beetle (phyllotreta Striolata), a Globally Destructive Pest of Cruciferae Crops.

dsRNAs Targeted to the Brown Planthopper Nilaparvata lugens: Assessing Risk to a Non-Target, Beneficial Predator, Cyrtorhinus lividipennis

Assessment of Potential Risks of Dietary RNAi to a Soil Micro-arthropod, Sinella curviseta Brook (Collembola: Entomobryidae)