A two-part tariff monopolist with resale

Daniel Flores

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111909

IF: 1.469

2024-08-18

Economics Letters

Abstract:I model resale in the context of a two-part tariff monopolist identifying two groups: low and high demand consumers. There is a group of potential intermediaries that resell the good to low demand consumers. I show that under certain circumstances resale can benefit the monopolist.

economics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Input Price Discrimination by Resale Market

Jeanine Miklls-Thal,Greg Shaffer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3191951

2018-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper analyzes supply tariffs that discriminate between resale in different markets. In a setting with competing retailers that operate in multiple (independent or interdependent) markets, we show that, all else equal, a monopolist supplier wants to discriminate against resale in the market with the higher aggregate cross-seller diversion ratio. We find that discrimination can improve allocative efficiency and present sufficient conditions, involving the pass-through rates and the inverse market demand curvatures in the different markets, under which discrimination has positive effects on output and welfare. Our insights are relevant for the policy treatment of vertical restraints on online sales.
Monetizing Showrooming

Ziying Zhang,Lin Liu,Yi Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3909684

IF: 4.638

2024-01-01

Production and Operations Management

Abstract:This paper explores how a strategic B&M retailer monetizes its showrooming service and how this affects a brand's incentive to use the service, consumer surplus, and social welfare. We build a stylized model in which the retailer decides the showrooming fee, and the brand decides whether to pay the fee to showcase its product in the retailer's offline channel in addition to its own online channel and separately sets the optimal prices for both channels. Consumers who face the uncertainty of the product value are assumed to have different levels of hassle costs of buying from the online channel and choosing which channel to visit. Our equilibrium analyses show that the brand has an incentive to use the retailer's offline channel to achieve an intended market segmentation based on hassle cost levels. Interestingly, the retailer's optimal profit and the brand's optimal prices both increase in search cost. Showrooming decreases consumer surplus when the value of a good match is relatively low or high, and a "Win-Win-Win-Win" situation in which all stakeholders (the retailer, the brand, consumers, and the social planner) benefit from monetizing the showrooming service may exist. Our paper also explores the role of a price-matching policy and service costs incurred by the retailer. Relevant managerial implications are discussed.
Scalping or Line-sitting: the Role of Speculators

Chen Qianqian,Shi Zhenyang,Yang Yi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-021-5517-1

2021-01-01

Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering

Abstract:Speculative behaviors have burgeoned in various business settings whereby it is costly for consumers to purchase directly from sellers. This paper examines the values of two typical speculative behaviors, scalping and line-sitting, against a backdrop of markets with resale. We establish a two-stage model in which a monopolist seller sells an item (product or service) to consumers in the first stage, and the item can be traded on a resale platform in the second stage. Speculators have no interests in consumption but incur lower costs in purchasing and reselling processes than consumers. In the scalping model, they buy the item first and resell it later to make profits. In the line-sitting model, they earn incomes by serving as surrogates of consumers in purchasing. We first find whether the two phenomena emerge critically depends on the value of consumers’ entry cost. Our main results indicate that both speculative behaviors can bring benefits to the seller and resale platform by a demand expansion effect, although through different mechanisms. Under scalping, the entry of speculators as additional buyers always boosts demand in both stages, and achieves a win-win outcome for the seller and platform, although less consumers remain in the market and the resale price decreases. Under line-sitting, demand is enlarged and profits rise in both stages, only when consumers find purchasing directly more time- and money-consuming, because they need to pay an extra service fee to speculators. Moreover, the consumer population gets better off from the two speculative behaviors when their entry cost is relatively high. When both models emerge, scalping may be preferable to line-sitting for the seller, resale platform and consumers, if the cost advantage of speculators in resale transactions is more evident.
Optimal Pricing Strategy for Durable-Goods Monopoly

RQ Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1889(00)00041-5

2001-01-01

Abstract:In this paper, we reconsider the profitability of a durable-good monopoly when the seller's discount rate may be different from the buyers’. In an infinite-horizon continuous-time full-commitment model, the monopoly can achieve more than the static monopoly profit if and only if the seller is more patient than the buyers. Under this condition, the price function is strictly decreasing over time. These results remain valid in models with buyers arriving sequentially, where the seller may have only one unit to sell or can produce more at constant marginal cost.
Resale Price Maintenance in a Successive Monopoly Model*

Markus Dertwinkel‐Kalt,Christian Wey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12368

IF: 1.054

2023-11-20

Journal of Industrial Economics

Abstract:We explain why a manufacturer may impose a minimum resale price in a successive monopoly setting. Our argument relies on the retailer having noncontractible choice variables such as the price of a substitute good and/or the retailer's service effort. Our explanation for minimum resale prices is empirically distinguishable from alternative justifications that rely, for instance, on retailer competition and service free riding among retailers. Whether a min RPM benefits or harms consumers depends on its effects: if it softens competition with the substitute product, it tends to harm consumers, and if it secures service provision, it tends to benefit consumers.

Economics
Optimal mechanism design with resale via bargaining

Jun Zhang,Ruqu Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2013.07.013

IF: 1.79

2013-01-01

Journal of Economic Theory

Abstract:In this paper, we examine the optimal mechanism design of selling an indivisible object to one regular buyer and one publicly known buyer, where inter-buyer resale cannot be prohibited. The resale market is modeled as a stochastic ultimatum bargaining game between the two buyers. We fully characterize an optimal mechanism under general conditions. Surprisingly, in this optimal mechanism, the seller never allocates the object to the regular buyer regardless of his bargaining power in the resale market. The seller sells only to the publicly known buyer, and reveals no additional information to the resale market. The possibility of resale causes the seller to sometimes hold back the object, which under our setup is never optimal if resale is prohibited. We find that the sellerʼs revenue is increasing in the publicly known buyerʼs bargaining power in the resale market. When the publicly known buyer has full bargaining power, Myersonʼs optimal revenue is achieved; when the publicly known buyer has no bargaining power, a conditionally efficient mechanism prevails.
Resale Market and Consumer Welfare

Liu Chong,Li Xing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14116/j.nkes.2013.01.007

2013-01-01

Abstract:We established a model to explain when resale market for ordinary tickets exists,and also discussed the influencing factors of resale market size and consumer welfare.By introducing the cost of reselling in the secondary market,consumers are endogenously divided into various categories,including general buyers,scalpers and high-type buyers.We find that capacity limit and price cap for sellers in the primary market are key conditions that resale market could exist.Conditions when high-type buyers enter the market is that average valuation over average reselling cost is relative high and the price cap in the primary market is relative low.What’s more,our simulation results show that size of resale market is increasing with buyer average valuation and decreasing with higher selling cost or capacity limit.Consumer welfare is increasing with buyer average valuation and capacity limit,but decreasing with average selling cost and price cap.
Optimal Mechanism Design with Speculation and Resale ∗

Jun Zhang,Ruqu Wang

2011-01-01

Abstract:In this paper, we examine the optimal mechanism design problem of selling an indivisible object to one regular buyer and one speculator, where inter-buyer resale cannot be prohibited. The resale market is modeled as a stochastic ultimatum bargaining game between the two buyers. We fully characterize the optimal mechanism under general conditions. Surprisingly, in the optimal mechanism, the seller never allocates the object to the regular buyer regardless of his bargaining power in the resale market. The seller sells only to the speculator, and reveals no additional information to the resale market. The possibility of resale causes the seller to sometimes hold back the object, which under our setup is never optimal if resale is prohibited. We find that the seller’s revenue is increasing in the speculator’s bargaining power in the resale market. When the speculator has full bargaining power, Myerson’s optimal revenue is achieved. When the speculator has no bargaining power, a conditional efficient mechanism prevails. Extension to the case of one speculator and many regular buyers is also discussed.
Auctions Versus Posted-Price Selling

RQ WANG

IF: 10.7

1993-01-01

American Economic Review

Abstract:Two popular selling methods - posted-price selling and auctions - are compared here in an independent private-values model. Without auctioning costs, auctioning is always optimal. When auctioning is costly, auctions are still preferable if the marginal-revenue curve is sufficiently steep. The global steepness of the marginal-revenue curve is found to coincide with the dispersion around the mean for a number of standard distributions. Finally, the prices of the monopoly seller and of the social optimum are compared.
Tariffs versus Quotas under Market Price Uncertainty

Hung-Yi Chen,Hong Hwang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-006-0062-z

2006-01-01

Review of World Economics

Abstract:This paper compares the welfare effects of a tariff and a quota in an imperfectly competitive market when demand is uncertain and policy must be chosen before the uncertainty is resolved. The model assumes a Cournot duopoly market with linear demand, additive uncertainty, homogeneous products, and constant marginal costs. It is shown that the optimal policy is autarky for high levels of uncertainty, a quota at the free-trade level for intermediate levels, and a tariff at low levels.
Revenue Management for a Supply Chain with Two Streams of Customers.

Qiying Hu,Yihua Wei,Yusen Xia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.006

IF: 6.4

2009-01-01

European Journal of Operational Research

Abstract:In this paper, we consider revenue management for a service supply chain with one supplier and one retailer. The supplier has a limited capacity of a perishable product and both the supplier and the retailer face customers. Each customer may choose to buy a product from either the supplier or the retailer by considering prices and the cost associated with switching. For the centralized model, the supplier determines the selling prices for both herself and the retailer, and the retailer simply collects a commission fee for each product sold. We derive monotone properties for the revenue functions and pricing strategies. Further, we show that the commission fee increases the retailer’s price while decreasing the supplier’s and leads to efficiency loss of the chain. For the decentralized decision-making model, the supplier and the retailer compete in price over time. Two models are considered. In the first, the retailer buys products from the supplier before the selling season and in the second the retailer shares products with the supplier in retailing. For both models, we discuss the existence of the equilibrium and characterize the optimal decisions. Numerical results are presented to illustrate properties of the models and to compare the supply chain performance between the centralized and the decentralized models.
Auctions versus sequential mechanisms when resale is allowed

Xiaogang Che,Tilman Klumpp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-022-01444-2

2022-08-06

Economic Theory

Abstract:We examine the problem of selling an object to a stream of potential buyers with independent private values and participation costs. If the object can be resold in the future, and resellers can make posted price offers, the original seller may prefer to deal with potential buyers sequentially instead of holding an auction. The reason is that resale opportunities compress the dispersion of buyers' willingness to pay for the object, which lowers the surplus each buyer expects to receive in the auction. This effect may reduce participation in the initial auction to just one buyer, in which case the seller obtains zero revenue. We show that a simple form of sequential mechanism allows the seller to extract positive revenue, and becomes approximately optimal if the resale market is large. Our finding contrasts with the result that sellers usually prefer auctions when resale is not allowed (see Bulow and Klemperer in Am Econ Rev 99(4):1544–1575, 2009).

economics
Reselling or Agency Selling? Consumer Valuation, Quality Design, and Manufacturers' Competition

Lu Hsiao,Xin Ma,Ying-Ju Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3782238

2021-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:The retail e-commerce yields lucrative revenue in many industries. In this work, we provide a strategic perspective by investigating how consumer valuation, product quality, and manufacturers’ competition influence the choice of selling agreement using stylized models. The utility and valuations of consumers are involved in analyzing strategic decisions under different selling agreement that is not trivial to analyze. We first show that agency selling agreement induces a higher retail price, but this can benefit the entire channel; under this agreement, the agency fee and consumer valuation present a nonmonotonic (approximately U-shaped) relation. Even though double marginalization exists, reselling agreement induces the manufacturer to make low-quality product compared to the agency selling agreement, but such a low-quality product is only profitable for the manufacturer. Second, when introducing manufacturers' competition, agency selling agreement can induce a wider quality difference: higher high-quality and lower low-quality. Agency selling agreement also hurts the manufacturer and the entire channel, but this is a preferred format for the low-quality manufacturer. Both the high-quality manufacturer and the entire channel and are profitable to choose the reselling agreement; offering a high-quality product can hurt the manufacturer remains robust. Third, the first-mover manufacturer can get a lower profit than the follower retailer. Moreover, when comparing scenarios with alternative sequences of making decisions, first-mover can lead to disadvantage, in that both supply chain parties prefer to act later rather than earlier. Our work also explains the rationale about why e-commerce firms in China now pay more attention to low-end consumers.
Selling or Leasing? Dynamic Pricing of Software with Upgrades

Kunhao Jia,Xiuwu Liao,Juan Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.063

2016-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:In this paper, we analyze the profitability of a selling and a leasing model by considering both software upgrades and different price discrimination strategies in a two-period model framework. Three price discrimination strategies are considered: inter-temporal, behavior-based, and a hybrid price discrimination strategy. We find that consumers' inter-temporal purchase behaviors and a vendor's choice of price discrimination strategies make it possible for a selling model to be more profitable than a leasing model. More specifically, if the monopolist cannot commit to never using information about consumers' past purchase behavior for price discrimination, the selling model is more profitable than the leasing model. We also find that if a selling model is adopted, the monopolist should choose the behavior-based price discrimination strategy with a reward for returning consumers; but if a leasing model is adopted, the monopolist should choose the inter-temporal price discrimination strategy with a rising price. We also extend our model to a duopoly market. Different from a monopoly case, we find that the selling model dominates the leasing model under the hybrid strategy, while these two models are equally profitable under the inter-temporal strategy. These findings provide new insights into the comparison of the selling and leasing models. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Dynamic Monopoly Pricing With Multiple Varieties: Trading Up

Stefan Buehler,Nicolas Eschenbaum

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.07146

2021-08-16

General Economics

Abstract:This paper studies dynamic monopoly pricing for a class of settings that includes multiple durable, multiple rental, or a mix of varieties. We show that the driving force behind pricing dynamics is the seller's incentive to switch consumers - buyers and non-buyers - to higher-valued consumption options by lowering prices ("trading up"). If consumers cannot be traded up from the static optimal allocation, pricing dynamics do not emerge in equilibrium. If consumers can be traded up, pricing dynamics arise until all trading-up opportunities are exhausted. We study the conditions under which pricing dynamics end in finite time and characterize the final prices at which dynamics end.
Resale or Agency Sale? Equilibrium Analysis on the Role of Live Streaming Selling

Caixia Hao,Lei Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.09.021

IF: 6.4

2022-09-27

European Journal of Operational Research

Abstract:The rise of live streaming selling has brought a revolution to the retail industry. The supply chain with platform-based retailing is faced with choice of sales formats and marketing decisions. We establish live streaming selling models with two sales formats of resale and agency sale, and three pricing strategies of same high, same low and differential strategies (HH, LL and D). We further explore the impacts of consumer returns, as they are typically higher in live streaming selling. Conventional wisdom believes that agency sale format can reduce double marginalization and benefit both the platform and the supplier, which cannot be achieved in resale format. Interestingly, our study shows that resale format may become a better choice for both the platform and the supplier when considering the impacts of consumer returns. This result holds in pricing strategies HH and D, where the key driver of sales format choice in strategy HH is commission rate while it is consumer's low valuation in strategy D. In strategy LL, resale is the supplier's preferred format and agency sale is better for the platform. Furthermore, we find with agency sale format, equilibrium pricing strategies HH and LL always exist; while with the resale format, equilibrium strategy HH exists only when considering consumer returns. Finally, we discuss the hybrid sales formats with and without price competition, and extend our models to encompass more scenarios.

operations research & management science
Redistribution Through Market Segmentation

Victor Augias,Alexis Ghersengorin,Daniel M. A. Barreto,Daniel M.A. Barreto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2406.14174

2024-06-20

Theoretical Economics

Abstract:Consumer data can be used to sort consumers into different market segments, allowing a monopolist to charge different prices at each segment. We study consumer-optimal segmentations with redistributive concerns, i.e., that prioritize poorer consumers. Such segmentations are efficient but may grant additional profits to the monopolist, compared to consumer-optimal segmentations with no redistributive concerns. We characterize the markets for which this is the case and provide a procedure for constructing optimal segmentations given a strong redistributive motive. For the remaining markets, we show that the optimal segmentation is surprisingly simple: it generates one segment with a discount price and one segment with the same price that would be charged if there were no segmentation. We also show that a regulator willing to implement the redistributive-optimal segmentation does not need to observe precisely the composition and the frequency of each market segment, the aggregate distribution over prices suffices.
Competing refurbishment in a supply chain with different selling modes

Yan Zhang,Wen Zhang,Xiao Shi,Ting Hou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-023-02180-7

IF: 8.3

2023-07-26

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Abstract:This study focuses on the optimal pricing and product refurbishing decisions of an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and a retailer in a supply chain. The OEM sells the new product through a retailer, which serves as a reseller or selling agency, and then chooses whether to provide the refurbished product to consumers. By constructing four models, we obtain the following results. First, we show that the OEM and the retailer always prefer to sell a refurbished product as a monopoly. Second, competing refurbishments leads to a prisoner’s dilemma in which both parties suffer greater losses compared to the no refurbishment scenario. This implies that competing refurbishments, except for product cannibalization, hinder the refurbishing industry. Finally, with different refurbishers, the OEM has different preferences for a new product’s selling format. However, when the retailer serves as the sole refurbisher, the OEM always prefers agency mode.

engineering, manufacturing,computer science, artificial intelligence
Quantity Competition under Resale Price Maintenance when Most Favored Customers are Strategic

Yossi Aviv,Mikhail Nediak,Yuri Levin,A. Bazhanov

2016-06-11

Abstract:Legal studies usually treat a policy of a manufacturer or retailer as socially harmful if it reduces product output and increases the price. We consider a two-period model where the first-period price is fixed by resale price maintenance (RPM) and resellers endogenously decide to use another "collusion suspect," meet-the-competition clause with a most-favored-customer clause (MFC), to counteract strategic customer behavior. As a result of MFC, second-period (reduced) price increases, and resellers' inventories decrease. However, customer surplus may increase and aggregate welfare increases in the majority of market situations. MFC can not only decrease the losses in welfare and resellers' profits due to strategic customers but, under reseller competition, may even lead to higher levels of these values than with myopic customers, i.e., to gains from increased strategic behavior. MFC may create "MFC-traps" for resellers, where one of possible market outcomes yields a gain from increased strategic behavior while another results in a reseller profit less than the worst profit in any stable outcome without MFC. With growing competition, benefits or losses from MFC can be higher than losses from strategic customer behavior.

Law,Economics,Business
Correlation‐savvy sellers

Roland Strausz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12465

2024-05-09

The RAND Journal of Economics

Abstract:A multi‐product monopolist sells sequentially to a buyer who privately learns his valuations. Using big data, the monopolist learns the intertemporal correlation of the buyer's valuations. Perfect price discrimination is generally unattainable—even when the seller learns the correlation perfectly, has full commitment, and in the limit where the consumption good about which the buyer has ex ante private information becomes insignificant. This impossibility is due to informational externalities that require information rents for the buyer's later consumption. These rents induce upward and downward distortions, violating the generalized no distortion at the top principle of dynamic mechanism design.

economics

A two-part tariff monopolist with resale

Input Price Discrimination by Resale Market

Monetizing Showrooming

Scalping or Line-sitting: the Role of Speculators

Optimal Pricing Strategy for Durable-Goods Monopoly

Resale Price Maintenance in a Successive Monopoly Model*

Optimal mechanism design with resale via bargaining

Resale Market and Consumer Welfare

Optimal Mechanism Design with Speculation and Resale ∗

Auctions Versus Posted-Price Selling

Tariffs versus Quotas under Market Price Uncertainty

Revenue Management for a Supply Chain with Two Streams of Customers.

Auctions versus sequential mechanisms when resale is allowed

Reselling or Agency Selling? Consumer Valuation, Quality Design, and Manufacturers' Competition

Selling or Leasing? Dynamic Pricing of Software with Upgrades

Dynamic Monopoly Pricing With Multiple Varieties: Trading Up

Resale or Agency Sale? Equilibrium Analysis on the Role of Live Streaming Selling

Redistribution Through Market Segmentation

Competing refurbishment in a supply chain with different selling modes

Quantity Competition under Resale Price Maintenance when Most Favored Customers are Strategic

Correlation‐savvy sellers