Does Surgical Approach Affect Dislocation Rate After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion? A Retrospective Analysis of 16,223 Cases
Nathan A. Huebschmann,Kyle W. Lawrence,Joseph X. Robin,Joshua C. Rozell,Matthew S. Hepinstall,Ran Schwarzkopf,Vinay K. Aggarwal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.068
IF: 4.435
2024-04-11
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Abstract:BACKGROUND Lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) is a risk factor for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The effect of the surgical approach on this association has not been investigated. This study examined the association between approach and dislocation following THA in patients who had prior LSF. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 16,223 primary elective THAs at our institution from June 2011 to September 2022. Patients who had LSF prior to THA were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Patients were stratified by LSF history, surgical approach, and intraoperative robot/navigation use to compare dislocation rates. There were 8,962 (55.2%) posterior, 5,971 (36.8%) anterior, and 1,290 (8.0%) laterally-based THAs. Prior LSF was identified in 323 patients (2.0%). Binary logistic regressions were used to assess the association of patient factors with dislocation risk. RESULTS There were 177 dislocations identified in total (1.1%). In non-adjusted analyses, the dislocation rate was significantly higher following the posterior approach among all patients ( P = 0.003). Prior LSF was associated with a significantly higher dislocation rate in all patients ( P < 0.001) and within the posterior ( P < 0.001), but not the anterior approach ( P = 0.514) subgroups. Multivariate regressions demonstrated anterior (OR [odds ratio] = 0.64, 95% CI [confidence interval] 0.45 to 0.91, P = 0.013) and laterally-based (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96, P = 0.039) approaches were associated with decreased dislocation risk, whereas prior LSF (OR = 4.28, 95% CI 2.38 to 7.69, P < 0.001) was associated with increased dislocation risk. Intraoperative technology utilization was not significantly associated with dislocation in the multivariate regressions (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.06, P = 0.095). CONCLUSION The current study confirmed that LSF is a significant risk factor for dislocation following THA, however, anterior and laterally-based approaches may mitigate dislocation risk in this population. In multivariate analyses including approach, LSF, and several perioperative variables, intraoperative technology utilization was not found to be significantly associated with dislocation risk.
orthopedics