Abstract:Introduction Periprosthetic infections are leading causes of revision surgery resulting in significant increased patient comorbidities and costs. Considerable research has targeted development of biomaterials that may eliminate implant-related infections.1 This in vitro study was developed to compare biofilm formation on three materials used in spinal fusion surgery – silicon nitride, PEEK, and titanium – using one gram-positive and one gram-negative bacterial species.Materials and Methods Several surface treated silicon nitride (Si3N4, MC2 ®, Amedica Corporation, Salt Lake City, UT), poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK, ASTM D6262), and medical grade titanium (Ti6Al4V, ASTM F136) discs O12.7 × 1mm were prepared or acquired for use in this well-plate study. Each group of discs (n=3) were ultrasonically cleaned, UV-sterilized, inoculated with 105 Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC® 25922™) or Escherichia coli (ATCC® 14990™) and placed in a culture medium of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 7% glucose and 10% human plasma on a shaking incubator at 37°C and 120 rpm for 24 or 48 hrs. Coupons were retrieved, rinsed in PBS to remove planktonic bacteria, placed in a centrifuge with fresh PBS, and vortexed. The bacterial solutions were serially diluted, plated, and incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 hrs. Colony forming units (CFU/mm2) were counted using applicable dilution factors and surface areas. A two-tailed, heteroscedastic Studentu0027s t-test (95% confidence) was used to determine statistical significance.Results Biofilm adhesion results are provided in Figures 1 and 2 for S. epi. and E. coli, respectively. For S. epi. at 24 hrs, biofilm growth on PEEK was about three orders of magnitude greater than on Ti6Al4V or any Si3N4 material (all pu003c0.005). Ti6Al4V also had more bacteria than the Si3N4 samples, but was only significant for as-fired and nitrogen-annealed treatments. Similar trends and significance for S. epi. were observed at 48 hrs. For E. coli , biofilm formation on PEEK was significantly greater than all other materials at both 24 and 48 hrs. Bacterial growth on Ti6Al4V was also statistically greater than all Si3N4conditions, with the possible exception of nitrogen-annealed Si3N4. By 48 hrs, PEEK remained 2 orders of magnitude above Ti6Al4V, and 2.5–3 orders of magnitude greater than the Si3N4 conditions. Ti6Al4V was also significantly greater than all of the Si3N4 treatments at 48 hrs.Discussion Si3N4, PEEK, and Ti6Al4V surfaces demonstrated significant differences in bacterial adhesion and proliferation for both gram-positive S. epi. and gram-negative E. coli, particularly at 48 hrs post-inoculation. The various Si3N4 samples showed the most favorable bacterial resistance for both species tested. The exact mechanism of the bacteriostatic behavior of Si3N4 is still under investigation; but it may result from chemical interaction with the materialu0027s surface to form peroxynitrite (a powerful oxidative agent).2Conclusion Identifying biomaterial surfaces that resist biofilm adhesion is an important emerging strategy in addressing implant-related infections. Si3N4 is a new biomaterial with the apparent potential to suppress biofilm formation.

Biofilm formation on bone grafts and bone graft substitutes: Comparison of different materials by a standard in vitro test and microcalorimetry

Biomechanical and Morphometric Evaluation of a Strontium-Incorporated Implant and Four Commercially Available Implants: A Study in Rabbits

Biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus on various implants used for surgical treatment of destructive spondylodiscitis

Quantitative flow chamber system for evaluating in vitro biofilms and the kinetics of S. aureus biofilm formation in human plasma media

Growth kinetics of candida biofilm on medical polymers: a long-term in vitro study

BACTERIOSTATIC BEHAVIOUR OF BIOMATERIALS UTILISED IN SPINAL FUSION SURGERY

3D printed β-tricalcium phosphate versus synthetic bone mineral scaffolds: A comparative in vitro study of biocompatibility

Biofilm formation on metal alloys and coatings, zirconia, and hydroxyapatite as implant materials in vivo

Biofilm Formation is Durably Prevented on Pre-Fabricated Antibiotic Cement Spacers Compared to Cobalt Chrome and Polyethylene

Effect of rapidly resorbable calcium phosphates and a calcium phosphate bone cement on the expression of bone-related genes and proteins in vitro.

Micro-Computed-Tomography-Guided Analysis of In Vitro Structural Modifications in Two Types of 45S5 Bioactive Glass Based Scaffolds

An in vitro biofilm model associated to dental implants: structural and quantitative analysis of in vitro biofilm formation on different dental implant surfaces

Properties of A New Poly (L-Lactic Acid)/Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate (Plla/beta-Tcp) Porous Scaffold in Vitro

Comparing the Rate of Dissolution of Two Commercially Available Synthetic Bone Graft Substitutes

Exploring the Biomaterial-Induced Secretome: Physical Bone Substitute Characteristics Influence the Cytokine Expression of Macrophages

Scanning electron image analysis to monitor of implant degradation and host healing following implantation of a drug-eluting bone graft void filler - biomed 2013

Evaluating Osteogenic Cell Differentiation Efficacy in the Presence of Polylactide Samples With Varied Compositions for Bone Grafting: In Vitro Study

Rapid screening of mineralization capacity of biomaterials by means of quantification of enzymatically deposited calcium phosphate.

Microbial adherence on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) surfaces

Molecular and Imaging Techniques for Bacterial Biofilms in Joint Arthroplasty Infections

Analyzing the Bioactivity of a Novel Bone Cement: An In Vitro Study