Abstract:In many species, male lifespan is shorter than that of females, often attributed to sexual selection favouring costly expression of traits preferred by females. Coevolutionary models of female preferences and male traits predict that males can be selected to have such life histories; however, this typically requires that females also pay some costs to express their preferences. Here we show that this problem diminishes when we link coevolutionary models of costly mate choice with the idea of stamina. In our model, the most successful males are those who can combine high attendance time on a lek — or, more generally, tenacious effort in their display time budgets — with high viability such that they are not too strongly compromised in terms of lifespan. We find that an opportunistic female strategy, that minimizes its costs by mating with highly visible (displaying) males, often beats other alternatives. It typically resists invasion attempts of genotypes that mate randomly in the population genetic sense, as well as invasion of stricter ways of being choosy (which are potentially costly if choice requires e.g. active rejection of all males who do not presently display, or risky travel to lekking sites). Our model can produce a wide range of male time budgets (display vs. self-maintenance). This includes cases of alternative mating tactics where males in good condition spend much time displaying, while those in poor condition never display yet, importantly, gain some mating success due to females not engaging in rejection behaviours should these be very costly to express. Significance statement In many species, males spend much time and energy on displaying to attract females, but it is not always clear what females gain from paying attention to male displays. The tradition in mathematical models attempting to understand the situation is to assume that random mating is the least costly option for females. However, random mating in the population genetic sense requires females to behave in a manner that equalizes mating success between displaying and non-displaying males, and here we point out that this is biologically unlikely. Opportunistically mating females can cause males to spend much of their time budgets displaying and will shorten male lifespans in a quality-dependent manner.

The evolution of dynamic and flexible courtship displays that reveal individual quality

Macroevolutionary patterning of woodpecker drums reveals how sexual selection elaborates signals under constraint

Modularity in the evolution of visual signals associated with aggressive displays

Sexual Selection And Species Recognition Promote Complex Male Courtship Displays In Ungulates

Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes

Sexually antagonistic co-evolution can explain female display signals and male sensory adaptations.

Within-population variation in signal timing preferences and its implications for sexual selection on male displays

Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection

Selection for male stamina can help explain costly displays with cost-minimizing female choice

Direct detection of male quality can facilitate the evolution of female choosiness and indicators of good genes: Evolution across a continuum of indicator mechanisms

Which cues are sexy? The evolution of mate preference in sympatric species reveals the contrasted effect of adaptation and reproductive interference

RUNAWAY SEXUAL SELECTION LEADS TO GOOD GENES

The Evolution of Postpairing Male Mate Choice

Female preference for multi-modal courtship: multiple signals are important for male mating success in peacock spiders

When does sexual selection through mate choice deplete versus exaggerate genetic variation: is there a lek paradox?

Multimodal signalling in manakins: lack of correlated evolution between acoustic, visual and behavioural traits

Surviving the serenade: how conflicting selection pressures shape the early stages of sexual signal diversification

A modular circuit coordinates the diversification of courtship strategies

Evolution of male life histories and age-dependent sexual signals under female choice

Perceptual biases, camouflage patterns, and the origin of sexual signals

The co-evolution of sexual desire, narcissistic vulnerability, and adaptations for reproductive advantage