Abstract:Abstract. Hydrological simulations are a main method of quantifying the contribution rate (CR) of climate change (CC) and human activities (HAs) to watershed streamflow changes. However, the uncertainty of hydrological simulations is rarely considered in current research. To fill this research gap, based on the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, in this study, we propose a new framework to quantify the contribution rate of climate change and human activities based on the posterior histogram distribution of hydrological simulations. In our new quantitative framework, the uncertainty of hydrological simulations is first considered to avoid the phenomenon of "equifinality for different parameters", which is common in hydrological simulations. The Lancang River (LR) Basin in China, which has been greatly affected by human activities in the past two decades, is then selected as the study area. The global gridded monthly sectoral water use data set (GMSWU), coupled with the dead capacity data of the large reservoirs within the LR basin and the Budyko hypothesis framework, are used to compare the calculation result of the novel framework. The results show that (1) the annual streamflow at Yunjinghong station in the Lancang River Basin changed abruptly in 2005, which was mainly due to the construction of the Xiaowan hydropower station that started in October 2004. The annual streamflow and annual mean temperature time series from 1961 to 2015 in the LR Basin showed a significant decreasing and increasing trend at the α = 0.01 significance level, respectively. The annual precipitation showed an insignificant decreasing trend. (2) The results of quantitative analysis using the new framework showed that the reason for the decrease in the streamflow at Yunjinghong station was 42.6 % due to climate change, and the remaining 57.4 % was due to human activities, such as the construction of hydropower stations within the study area. (3) The comparison with the other two methods showed that the contribution rate of climate change calculated by the Budyko framework and the GMSWU data were 37.2 % and 42.5 %, respectively, and the errors of the calculations of the new framework proposed in this study were within 5 %. Therefore, the newly proposed framework, which considers the uncertainty of hydrological simulations, can accurately quantify the contribution rate of climate change and human activities to streamflow changes. (4) The quantitative results calculated by using the simulation results with the largest Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) indicated that climate change was the dominant factor for streamflow reduction, which was in opposition to the calculation results of our new framework. In other words, our novel framework could effectively solve the calculation errors caused by the “equifinality for different parameters” of hydrological simulations. (5) The results of this case study also showed that the reduction in the streamflow in June and November was mainly caused by decreased precipitation and increased evapotranspiration, while the changes in the streamflow in other months were mainly due to human activities such as the regulation of the constructed reservoirs. In general, the novel quantitative framework that considers the uncertainty of hydrological simulations presented in this study has validated an efficient alternative for quantifying the contribution rate of climate change and human activities to streamflow changes.

Attribution of Streamflow Changes Considering Spatial Contributions and Driver Interactions Based on Hydrological Modeling

Attribution Analysis of Streamflow Changes Based on Large-scale Hydrological Modeling with Uncertainties

A Complementary Streamflow Attribution Framework Coupled Climate, Vegetation and Water Withdrawal

Attribution Analysis For Runoff Change On Multiple Scales In A Humid Subtropical Basin Dominated By Forest, East China

How Do Natural Climate Variability, Anthropogenic Climate and Basin Underlying Surface Change Affect Streamflows? A Three-Source Attribution Framework and Application

Dynamic Attribution Analysis for Runoff Change Integrating Landsat-Derived Land Use Dynamics with Swat Model

Applicability of attribution methods for identifying runoff changes in changing environments

Attribution of streamflow changes during 1961–2019 in the Upper Yangtze and the Upper Yellow River basins

A Framework for Methodological Options to Assess Climatic and Anthropogenic Influences on Streamflow

A new approach to separating the impacts of climate change and multiple human activities on water cycle processes based on a distributed hydrological model

Attribution of Climate Change and Human Activities to Streamflow Variations with a Posterior Distribution of Hydrological Simulations

A multiscale attribution framework for separating the effects of cascade and individual reservoirs on runoff

Inter‐ and intra‐annual fluctuations and attribution analysis of runoff and sediment transport in the middle and lower Yangtze River

Reconciling the Attribution of Changes in Streamflow Extremes from a Hydroclimate Perspective

River Hydrological Regime Changes and Their Attribution: A Case Study in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River Using a Multi‐Model Approach

Variations in water conservation function and attributions in the Three-River Source Region of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau based on the SWAT model

Spatial Hydrological Responses to Land Use and Land Cover Changes in a Typical Catchment of the Yangtze River Delta Region

Modeling streamflow response under changing environment using a modified SWAT model with enhanced representation of CO2 effects

Attribution of streamflow changes across the globe based on the Budyko framework

Simulation and attribution analysis of runoff–sediment in the Upper Basin of Fenhe River, China

Hydrological Response to Urbanization at Different Spatio-Temporal Scales Simulated by Coupling of CLUE-S and the SWAT Model in the Yangtze River Delta Region