Abstract:Abstract Background Outcome prediction after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) based on electronic health records (EHR) using machine learning (ML) is not yet established. Purpose The aim of the study was to assess the value of ML methods to predict the risk of AF recurrence after catheter ablation based on easily accessible EHR. Methods We analyzed 1362 patients from our prospective registry. Only patients undergoing a first AF ablation were studied. Follow-up was performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after the ablation including 24-hour and 7-day Holter electrocardiogram (ECG). Four different analyses with increasing complexity out of a set of overall 22 features using seven simple and three ensemble method ML algorithms were performed: model 1 (including age, sex, height, weight, and established anamnestic risk factors: AF-type, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, hypertension, current smoker, diabetes, renal insufficiency), model 2: model 1 plus additional AF-history features (duration of AF in months, previous typical atrial flutter, number of previous electrical cardioversions, number of failed antiarrhythmic drugs), model 3: model 2 plus simple echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular ejection fraction, LA diameter), model 4: model 3 plus biomarkers (CRP, creatinine, NTproBNP). To evaluate the performance of the prediction, we report C-statistics, accuracy, and recall (sensitivity). The C-statistics of five risk scores for AF recurrence (APPLE, DR-FLASH, BASE-AF2, ATLAS, CHA2DS2-Vasc) and a logistic regression with a forward selection were calculated for comparison. Results Of the 1362 patients, 996 (73%) were male, mean age was 62±10 years and 60% presented with paroxysmal AF. Recurrence of AF during 1-year follow-up was observed in 458 patients (34%). The results for the four models using the eleven different ML algorithms are summarized in the Figure. In detail, the C-statistics were modest with a maximal value of 0.602 for the random forest (RF) classifier for the most complex model 4. The performance for the risk scores was maximal for the APPLE score (C-statistics 0.572) and comparable for the forward-selection logistic regression including five features with a C-statistics of 0.607 (95% CI 0.573-0.641). Conclusion In conclusion, outcome prediction of AF recurrence after catheter ablation with easily accessible EHR data remains challenging and cannot be improved simply by applying machine learning methods. Whether a more comprehensive feature selection, such as more complex ECG parameters instead of the selection of easily available features from the EHR, a combination with deep neural network-based feature extraction, or unsupervised ML might improve the result in a clinically relevant way needs further investigation. Results of the eleven ML algorithms

Explainable machine learning model reveals its decision-making process in identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation at high risk for recurrence after catheter ablation

Potential Maintenance Mechanism in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Subject to Different Treatment Procedures: A Preliminary Study Based on a Human Atrial Model

Current Progress of Computational Modeling for Guiding Clinical Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Machine Learning Models of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Prediction After Cardiac Surgery.

Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Detecting and Predicting Atrial Arrhythmias Post Catheter Ablation

Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Anchored Reentry Substrate Created by Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Computational Models

Machine learning model for predicting late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes: A Machine Learning Approach Leveraging a Large Administrative Claims Database

Machine learning for outcome prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

Viable Prediction for Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation

Using Machine Learning to Enhance Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Catheter Ablation

Deep Learning Model for Predicting Rhythm Outcomes after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Explainable Machine-Learning Predictions for Complications after Pediatric Congenital Heart Surgery

Machine Learning-Predicted Progression to Permanent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation

Using Machine Learning to Predict 30-Day Hospital Readmissions in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation

Model for predicting the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after monopolar or bipolar radiofrequency ablation in patients with AF and mitral valve disease

Exploring interpretability in deep learning prediction of successful ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation

Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence by Combining Population Data and Virtual Cohorts of Patient-Specific Left Atrial Models

A prediction model of atrial fibrillation recurrence after first catheter ablation by a nomogram--HASBLP score

Machine learning-based risk models for procedural complications of radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation