Sagittal balance of the spine - lumbar lordosis or lumbosacral lordosis?
Kai Song,Pengfei Chi,Qiang Yang,Cao Yang,Bing Wang,Fangcai Li,Zezhang Zhu,Weishi Li,Jianguo Zhang,Zheng Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.19.24304424
2024-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate sagittal spinal alignment from the perspective of the overall curvature of the “S” curve of the human spine, and explore the roles of pelvic incidence (PI) and maximal thoracolumbar vertebral tilt(TLmax) in the classification of the sagittal spinal aligment.
Methods The tilt of the sacral, lumbar, and thoracic vertebrae (from Co1, S5, S4… to C7) were measured. The minimal sacral vertebral tilt(Smin), maximal thoracolumbar vertebral tilt(TLmax), and minimal thoracic vertebral tilt (Tmin) were recorded. The concept of lumbosacral lordosis (LSL) was introduced, and the Ferguson method was utilized to measure sagittal spinal parameters both in anatomical segmentation (Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12) and functional segmentation (Ferguson LSLmax, Ferguson TKmax). The subjects were grouped based on pelvic incidence (PI) and TLmax separately, and the mean and standard deviation of each parameter were calculated. Chi-square tests were conducted for statistical analysis.
Results 1. Based on PI grouping: PI for all subjects was 45.4 ± 9.5° (21.7-86.4°). Group A consisted of 117 subjects with a mean PI of 34.7 ± 4.4°, Group B had 158 subjects with a mean PI of 45.2 ± 2.9°, and Group C included 113 subjects with a mean PI of 56.7 ± 5.8°. No statistically significant differences were found in tilt of S2, L1, T1, TLmax, Tmin, and Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12, and Ferguson TKmax among Groups A, B, and C. 2. Based on TLmax grouping: TLmax for all subjects was 110.5 ± 5.5° (94.4-132.0°). Group A had 91 subjects with a mean TLmax of 104.0 ± 2.3°, Group B comprised 216 subjects with a mean TLmax of 110.2 ± 2.1°, and Group C included 81 subjects with a mean TLmax of 118.6 ± 3.8°. Significant statistical differences were observed in tilt of S2, L1, T1, Smin, TLmax, Tmin, and Ferguson L1-S2, Ferguson T1-T12, Ferguson LSLmax, and Ferguson TKmax among Groups A, B, and C.
Conclusion There were no differences in the magnitude of LSL and TK among subjects with different PI, indicating that PI does not affect the overall curvature of the “S” curve in the sagittal spinal aligment. In contrast, TLmax effectively distinguishes the overall curvature of the “S” curve.
### Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
### Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
### Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital gave ethical approval (S2023-446-02) for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors