Abstract:People can extract ensemble representations from different types of visual stimuli, for example, average location, size or direction from sets of dots, circles and gabors, as well as average emotion, identity or attractiveness from sets of faces. However, ensemble representations of facial emotion, identity and attractiveness were observed to be different from that of the physical attributes of simple geometry stimuli in many aspects. Firstly, the relationship between the member representation and the ensemble representation seemed to vary dependent on the stimuli and the attributes. For simple stimuli and physical attributes, the feature of the set could be estimated accurately while the features of the members might have been lost or discarded. But for faces and facial attributes, the features of the members seemed retained and could support successful identification. Secondly, the effects of set size and duration were reported to differ between different stimulus ensembles and different attributes. For simple stimuli and physical attributes, the process of ensemble representation remained relatively unchanged when the set size expanded or the duration shortened. On the other hand, for faces and facial attributes, the same process seemed to be partly affected by the change of set size and duration, showing some sensitivity to the amount of information presented in a given period of time. Thirdly, the effect of member variability upon ensemble representation was also recorded to differ. For simple stimuli and physical attributes, the degree of variation among members could influence the accuracy of estimating the mean of the set. But for faces and facial attributes, the accuracy of the estimation remained the same despite increase of variation. These observed differences suggest that the underlying cognitive mechanism for ensemble representation may vary from stimulus to stimulus, from attribute to attribute. Parallel processing and texture analysis may be dominant in the ensemble representation of simple stimuli, especially when estimating the set mean of physical attributes like location, size or direction. This could be the reason why an `advantage of the whole' was reported and the mean estimation would prevail even when the identification of members failed. Meanwhile, sequential processing and facial holistic analysis may be essential in the ensemble representation of faces. Because every single face was processed as an independent and holistic subject, information of member faces was retained during ensemble representation and the identification of member stimuli could thus be accomplished. In light of these differences in both observations and mechanisms, future research should try to separate the perception of individual set members and the representation of the set so as to directly compare the ensemble processing of various types of stimuli with different attributes. Furthermore, it would be worthwhile to explore ensemble representations of social dimensions inferred by faces, like credibility, social openness and so on.

The perceptual and mnemonic effects of ensemble representation on individual size representation

Ensemble Size Perception: Its Neural Signature and the Role of Global Interaction over Individual Items

Remembering Sets: Capacity Limit and Time Limit of Ensemble Representations in Working Memory.

Ensemble size judgments account for size constancy

Integration of Ensemble Representations Stored in Visual Working Memory

Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.

Memory of Ensemble Representation Was Independent of Attention

Effect of attention on ensemble perception: Comparison between exogenous attention, endogenous attention, and depth

Ensemble memory of a scene interacts with current perception regardless of attentional requirements.

Differences in Ensemble Representation Dependent on Various Stimulus Types and Attributes

Memory matching features bias the ensemble perception of facial identity

Completeness out of Incompleteness: Inferences from Regularities in Imperfect Information Ensembles.

Completeness Out of Incompleteness Inferences and Employment Regarding Regularities in Imperfect Information Ensembles

Effects of Selective Attention on Mean-Size Computation: Weighted Averaging and Perceptual Enlargement

Comparing explicit and implicit ensemble perception: 3 stimulus variables and 3 presentation modes

What is the basis of ensemble subset selection?

Size constancy affects the perception and parietal neural representation of object size

Organization Principles in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Sequential Stimulus Display

Cooperative but Not Competitive Relationship Drives Perceptual Grouping of Objects

Set size and ensemble perception of numerical value

A Population Response Model of Ensemble Perception