The role of rationales for and criticisms of ethical decisions in the development of meta-moral cognitive skills
Reena Cheruvalath,Emmanuel Manalo,Hiroaki Ayabe,Reena CheruvalathEmmanuel ManaloHiroaki Ayabea Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani K.K. Birla Goab Graduate School of Education,Kyoto Universityc JSPS Fellow,National Institute for Physiological Sciences
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2024.2332915
2024-03-26
Ethics & Behavior
Abstract:Meta-moral cognitive skills consist of identifying reasons behind ethical decisions, potential criticisms for such reasons, and constructing counterarguments for these criticisms. We assessed the relationship among these three elements of ethical judgment justification using ethical dilemmas. A mixed-methods research design was used to investigate university students from India and Japan. Critical thinking skills, knowledge of professional ethics, discipline, perspective-taking, common sense, and culture influenced the respondents' meta-moral cognitive skills. There was a correlation between the number/strength of reasons and criticisms and between criticisms and counterarguments. The respondents had difficulty connecting the reasons for their decisions and their counterarguments. The results imply that incorporating personal and professional cases as part of the ethics curriculum can improve meta-moral cognitive skills.
psychology, multidisciplinary,ethics