A prospective study on tumour response assessments methods after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in early oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer

Sara Manzano,Kepa Elorriaga,Julio Herrero,Ainhara Lahuerta,Virginia Segur,Maria M. Caffarel,Ander Urruticoechea,Joanna I. Lopez-Velazco,Maria Otano,Nuria Bulto,Isabel Alvarez-Lopez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.02.23285373
2023-02-07
MedRxiv
Abstract:Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in oestrogen receptor (ER) positive HER2 negative breast cancer allows real-time evaluation of drug efficacy as well as investigation of the biological and molecular changes that occur after estrogenic deprivation. Clinical and pathological evaluation after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy may be used to obtain prognostic and predictive information of tumour response to decide adjuvant treatment. In this setting, clinical scales developed to evaluate response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are not useful and there are not many validated biomarkers to assess response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy beyond Ki67 expression and preoperative prognostic index (PEPI) score. In this prospective study, we extensively analysed radiological (by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging) and pathological tumour response of 104 postmenopausal patients with ER+/HER2- resectable breast cancer, treated with neoadjuvant endocrine treatment for a mean of 7 months prior to surgery. Our results show that radiological evaluation by both USS and MRI underestimate pathological tumour size, although they support the use of MRI over USS to clinically assess tumour response. In addition, we propose that the tumour cellularity size, calculated as the product of the percentage of residual tumour cellularity in the surgical specimen and the tumour pathological size, could become a new tool to standardize response assessment to NET given its good correlation with and potential added value to existing biomarkers. Our findings shed light on the dynamics of tumour response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, challenge the paradigm of the ability of NET to decrease surgical volume and point to the utility of the tumour cellularity size to quantify the scattered tumour response usually produced by endocrine therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?