Assessment of left atrioventricular coupling and left atrial function impairment in diabetes with and without hypertension using CMR feature tracking
Rui Shi,Yi-Ning Jiang,Wen-Lei Qian,Ying-Kun Guo,Yue Gao,Li-Ting Shen,Li Jiang,Xue-Ming Li,Zhi-Gang Yang,Yuan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01997-z
IF: 8.949
2023-10-30
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Abstract:Abstract Purpose The study was designed to assess the effect of co-occurrence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension on the deterioration of left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) and left atrial (LA) function in comparison to individuals suffering from DM only. Methods From December 2015 to June 2022, we consecutively recruited patients with clinically diagnosed DM who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at our hospital. The study comprised a total of 176 patients with DM, who were divided into two groups based on their blood pressure status: 103 with hypertension (DM + HP) and 73 without hypertension (DM-HP). LA reservoir function (reservoir strain (ε s ), total LA ejection fraction (LAEF)), conduit function (conduit strain (ε e ), passive LAEF), booster-pump function (booster strain (ε a ) and active LAEF), LA volume index (LAVI), LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), and LACI were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results After adjusting for age, sex, body surface area (BSA), and history of current smoking, total LAEF (61.16 ± 14.04 vs. 56.05 ± 12.72, p = 0.013) and active LAEF (43.98 ± 14.33 vs. 38.72 ± 13.51, p = 0.017) were lower, while passive LAEF (33.22 ± 14.11 vs. 31.28 ± 15.01, p = 0.807) remained unchanged in the DM + HP group compared to the DM-HP group. The DM + HP group had decreased ε s (41.27 ± 18.89 vs. 33.41 ± 13.94, p = 0.006), ε e (23.69 ± 12.96 vs. 18.90 ± 9.90, p = 0.037), ε a (17.83 ± 8.09 vs. 14.93 ± 6.63, p = 0.019), and increased LACI (17.40±10.28 vs. 22.72±15.01, p = 0.049) when compared to the DM-HP group. In patients with DM, multivariate analysis revealed significant independent associations between LV GLS and εs (β=-1.286, p < 0.001), εe (β=-0.919, p < 0.001), and εa (β=-0.324, p = 0.036). However, there was no significant association observed between LV GLS and LACI (β=-0.003, p = 0.075). Additionally, hypertension was found to independently contribute to decreased εa (β=-2.508, p = 0.027) and increased LACI in individuals with DM (β = 0.05, p = 0.011). Conclusions In DM patients, LV GLS showed a significant association with LA phasic strain. Hypertension was found to exacerbate the decline in LA booster strain and increase LACI in DM patients, indicating potential atrioventricular coupling index alterations.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,endocrinology & metabolism