Herbal and dietary supplement-induced liver injury in Taiwan: comparison with conventional drug-induced liver injury

Yi-Shin Huang,Ting-Tsung Chang,Cheng-Yuan Peng,Gin-Ho Lo,Chao-Wei Hsu,Chi-Tan Hu,Yi-Hsiang Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-021-10241-3
IF: 9.029
2021-08-11
Hepatology International
Abstract:Background and aimsWhether herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) are safer than Western conventional drugs is controversial. The aim of this study was to explore the characteristics and risk factors for HDS-induced liver injury (HILI) in Taiwan.MethodsThis is a 9-year multi-center prospective study conducted in Taiwan from 2011 to 2019. Patients with HILI were compared to those with conventional drug-induced liver injury (CILI).ResultsA total of 1,297 patients were enrolled, of whom 285 (22.0%) had HILI and 1,012 (78.0%) had CILI. Compared to the CILI group, the HILI group had higher initial serum alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), peak ALP and bilirubin levels, and higher rates of jaundice, ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, sepsis and acute liver failure. In addition, the HILI group had a higher mortality rate than the CILI group (12.6 vs. 8.0%, p = 0.016). Hepatitis B carrier status, elevated baseline liver biochemical tests and the use of crude herbs (without processing) were associated with an increased risk of HILI-related mortality (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 2.90 [1.43–5.99], 2.40 [1.01–5.68] and 2.94 [1.45–5.97], respectively).ConclusionsHDS are popular and incriminated in more than one-fifth of drug-induced liver injuries in Taiwan. The patients with HILI were more severe than those with CILI in terms of liver biochemical tests, complications and mortality. Hepatitis B carriers, those with elevated baseline liver tests and crude herb users may have a higher risk of HILI-related mortality. The prudent use of HDS is suggested in these high-risk subjects.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?