Abstract:Runtime Verification (RV) is a lightweight formal technique in which program or system execution is monitored and analyzed, to check whether certain properties are satisfied or violated after a finite number of steps. The use of RV has led to interest in deciding whether a property is monitorable: whether it is always possible for the satisfaction or violation of the property to be determined after a finite future continuation. However, classical two-valued monitorability suffers from two inherent limitations. First, a property can only be evaluated as monitorable or non-monitorable; no information is available regarding whether only one verdict (satisfaction or violation) can be detected. Second, monitorability is defined at the language-level and does not tell us whether satisfaction or violation can be detected starting from the current monitor state during system execution. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a new notion of four-valued monitorability for $\omega$-languages and applies it at the state-level. Four-valued monitorability is more informative than two-valued monitorability as a property can be evaluated as a four-valued result, denoting that only satisfaction, only violation, or both are active for a monitorable property. We can also compute state-level weak monitorability, i.e., whether satisfaction or violation can be detected starting from a given state in a monitor, which enables state-level optimizations of monitoring algorithms. Based on a new six-valued semantics, we propose procedures for computing four-valued monitorability of $\omega$-regular languages, both at the language-level and at the state-level. We have developed a new tool that implements the proposed procedure for computing monitorability of LTL formulas.

Axiomatizing recursion-free, regular monitors

The Cost of Monitoring Alone

Adventures in Monitorability: From Branching to Linear Time and Back Again

A Note on Monitors and Büchi automata

Determinizing monitors for HML with recursion

Monitoring hyperproperties with circuits

Four-valued monitorability of $ω$-regular languages

Towards Partial Monitoring: It is Always too Soon to Give Up

Quantitative and Approximate Monitoring

Selective Monitoring

From propositional to first-order monitoring

On distributed monitoring of asynchronous systems

Distributed system contract monitoring

An Operational Guide to Monitorability

Regular Model Checking with Regular Relations

Monitoring Metric First-Order Temporal Properties

Monads, partial evaluations, and rewriting

LTLf and LDLf Monitoring: A Technical Report

Centralized vs Decentralized Monitors for Hyperproperties

On the Monitorability of Session Types, in Theory and Practice (Extended Version)

On Runtime Enforcement via Suppressions